Bullet Proof Shields For Military Infantry

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the development and practicality of bulletproof shields for military infantry. Participants highlight the current use of the Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV), which effectively stops 7.62mm rounds and incorporates ceramic plates for critical protection. The conversation also addresses the balance between carrying heavy packs, such as the MOLLE ruck and assault pack, and the potential benefits of lightweight shields for temporary protection in urban scenarios. Future advancements may include technologies like monofilament mesh or active camouflage within the next decade.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of military body armor, specifically the Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV)
  • Familiarity with military equipment terminology, including MOLLE rucks and assault packs
  • Knowledge of ballistic protection standards and ammunition types, particularly 7.62mm rounds
  • Awareness of emerging technologies in military applications, such as monofilament mesh and active camouflage
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advancements in military body armor technology, focusing on IOTV and its capabilities
  • Explore the design and functionality of lightweight bulletproof shields for infantry use
  • Investigate the potential of monofilament mesh and active camouflage in military applications
  • Study the impact of equipment load on soldier mobility and effectiveness in combat scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Military personnel, defense technology researchers, and anyone interested in advancements in infantry protection and equipment efficiency.

average guy
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
mechie's
i saw some news footage awhile ago
and the troops were running across an airport runway
being sniped at.
where are they at with developing and issuing shields now?
anybody have first hand experience.
is the thinking keep the heavy pack on so
you don't get shot in the back?
if so i say ditch the pack and go ask for a back shield.
i have seen some shields in sci fi movies and series.
( my girlfriend watches them )

Have A Nice Day!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No idea what purpose a shield would really have besides make us use an extra hand which believe it or not will not be possible. As for the pack, it depends which pack you mean. The large MOLLE ruck we usually ditch if assaulting an objective but carry if moving out of a kill box simply because it has all our stuff (mortar shells, food, sleeping bag, etc) and leaving it in a kill box seems like a bad idea. Heck it can even be used to form low cover and base for firing.

The assault pack on the other hand is kept because it, well the name gives it away. So no it isn't used to stop from getting shot in the back. The IOTV is capable of stopping a 7.76mm round. (The IOTV is the body armor currently issued.)
 
A good friend of mine is a forward air controller. Been shot 5 times. $6500 of body armor has kept him safe. It has ceramic plates in the critical spots. They shatter and are replaced.
 
Engineers somewhere else said they're 2 packs; to paraphrase 'full pack' and 'attack pack'. The one time i saw on tv just looked bad, running across open space with full pack. Sounds like things are getting done right and that's good. Idea of shield is light and for temporary protection. Maybe just urban scenario and zero pack once again all sounds good. Go get 'em.

Have A Nice Day!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the pack contains equipment, and tools necessary to complete a particular mission.
as far as shields go, technology that can be implemented within ten years, maybe a monofilament mesh of some sort or active camouflage
 

Similar threads

What are your thoughts on 'Ad Astra' and Will Smith's upcoming Gemini Man?
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K