Burning Hydrocarbons with by products

  • Thread starter Thread starter j0n0x0r
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Creating a synthetic hydrocarbon that eliminates harmful byproducts during combustion is highly challenging. Burning hydrocarbons in oxygen will always produce some reaction products, primarily carbon dioxide, which is a significant greenhouse gas. While CO2 is often viewed as harmful, it is thermodynamically a desirable outcome of hydrocarbon combustion. The discussion raises questions about what constitutes harmful byproducts and the feasibility of developing cleaner alternatives. Overall, the consensus is that complete elimination of harmful emissions from hydrocarbon combustion remains unlikely.
j0n0x0r
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Would it ever be possible to make a synthetic hydrocarbon that wouldn't produce harmful by products.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
j0n0x0r said:
Would it ever be possible to make a synthetic hydrocarbon that wouldn't produce harmful by products.

I assume you mean when burned in oxygen. There will always be some product of the reaction. Carbon dioxide seems "harmful" in the sense that it is a greenhouse gas. I don't know what you can burn that won't produce CO2, but I'm no chemist. My question would be what products do you consider harmful?
 
Thermodynamically, CO2 is a desirable product of hydrocarbon combustion.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top