SOS2008
Gold Member
- 42
- 1
The newest lie is a two-for-one. Lie Part I (a recycled lie):
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10991763/
Bush on the offensive over secret spy program
“It’s amazing that people say to me, ‘Well, he’s just breaking the law.’ If I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress?” [Heh!] said Bush.
Bush did not brief Congress, rather the “president provided limited notification to only a few lawmakers” who were sworn to secrecy. Which prompted a letter of grave concern and request for more details--details that were never provided:
That's what Bush calls briefing Congress?
Lie Part II:
Er…WHAT!? Democrats most certainly support sureveillance of terrorists—as long as it’s done legally!
So Karl is back in his laboratory cooking up more crap. Who let the dog out? Well we’ll see how long the “terrorist surveillance” propaganda works once the photos of Bush and Abramoff are released.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10991763/
Bush on the offensive over secret spy program
“It’s amazing that people say to me, ‘Well, he’s just breaking the law.’ If I wanted to break the law, why was I briefing Congress?” [Heh!] said Bush.
Bush did not brief Congress, rather the “president provided limited notification to only a few lawmakers” who were sworn to secrecy. Which prompted a letter of grave concern and request for more details--details that were never provided:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/19/AR2005121901641.htmlJohn D. Rockefeller IV, a wealthy man representing a poor state, had been the top Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee for six months when he sat down to a secret briefing on July 17, 2003. What he heard alarmed him so much that immediately afterward he wrote two identical letters, by hand, expressing his concerns.
He sent one to Vice President Cheney and placed the other -- as he pointedly warned Cheney he would -- in a safe in case anyone in the future might challenge his version of what happened. Rockefeller proved prophetic.
That's what Bush calls briefing Congress?

Lie Part II:
Beginning by making the statement that Democrats do not support surveillance of terrorists.Bush’s top political adviser, Karl Rove, meanwhile, has put Democrats on notice that the White House regards the issue as a political winner for Republicans in this year’s congressional elections.
Er…WHAT!? Democrats most certainly support sureveillance of terrorists—as long as it’s done legally!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10991763/Democrats countered that many important questions remain.
“We can be strong and operate under the rule of law,” said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “These are not mutually exclusive principles — they are the principles upon which our nation was founded.”
So Karl is back in his laboratory cooking up more crap. Who let the dog out? Well we’ll see how long the “terrorist surveillance” propaganda works once the photos of Bush and Abramoff are released.