By definition the space time fabric must have mass.

AmpedForay
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

My post involves the unexpected continued expansion of the universe. As if matter is being accelerated by some means of unknown repulsion.

Let us assume that current space time theory is correct. And that there is a "fabric" of space.
We are all familiar with the grid representation of space time with a gravity source acting as a dimple.

Now let us consider the big bang. All matter and energy is condensed in a practically infinite
singularity. So, at this point even space time does not exist outside of this singularity.

Now, in one instant this singularity erupts all space time matter and energy into the universe.
This means that the actual "fabric" of space time is also created. Would not this space time
creation result in a wave of creation. A wave that would force matter from its source and continue to propagate.
Hence, as the space time fabric is created it would actually pull matter and energy further from source.

So, instead of dark matter, it is the "mass" of the immense expanse of space time that should fill these equations.
Looking at it a different way, if space time is warped by gravity, then it must have mass.

Your thoughts?

Ampe
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
How would you define the mass of "space time"
 
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top