B C as Energy Conversion Constant: Conservation Law Explained

xcom2112
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I was thinking about the law of conservation of energy, states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

Then I thought about it more broadly, it actually states that the universe was created with a fixed amount of energy (and this energy only transforms from one form to another)

And then I thought a little more, in the big bang the universe was formed from energy, part of that energy became matter, according to the famous equation E = mc2

or Electromagnetic waves
f83cb831ce59c5745ee4e7af60b4f68710405b6b


so C is not the speed of electromagnetic waves (in a vacuum) or anything like that, it is simply the ratio in which energy becomes something else.

And if the energy in the universe is constant (as I assumed at the beginning), which for me is the only axiom, then if the waves will move faster than C , the energy conservation law will simply be violated.

Maybe someone already put it this way? (I've never seen, at least not at university, a way of looking at things like that)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of energy does not apply to the universe as a whole - there is no global energy conservation in general relativity.
xcom2112 said:
so C is not the speed of electromagnetic waves (in a vacuum) or anything like that, it is simply the ratio in which energy becomes something else.
It is related to both. But more fundamentally, it is the universal speed limit.
xcom2112 said:
then if the waves will move faster than C , the energy conservation law will simply be violated.
That doesn't make sense.
 
xcom2112 said:
And if the energy in the universe is constant (as I assumed at the beginning), which for me is the only axiom
That's a natural assumption, but it turns out not to be correct. It's not so much that energy isn't conserved (it is - see below) but that there is no unambiguous way of defining "the total amount of energy in the universe" so nothing we can point to and say "this quantity is conserved".

We can reword the law of conservation of energy to be more precise: Imagine an arbitrarily small box. At some moment it contains a certain amount of energy, and a moment later it contains a different amount. The difference between the two will be exactly equal to the amount of energy that left or entered the box. In this form the law of conservation of energy works just fine, but it is also clear that it cannot be extended to cover the entire universe. For a bit more detail, you might be interested in http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html
 
xcom2112 said:
part of that energy became matter, according to the famous equation E = mc2

The ##m## in the expression ##mc^2## represents mass, not matter. The Einstein mass-energy equivalence teaches us that mass is not a measure of the quantity of matter because the mass of a composite body is made up in at least part by the energies of the constituents.

And ##mc^2## is not equal to the total energy of a body. It's equal to the rest energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager and SiennaTheGr8
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top