C is incorrect. Work and Friction: A, B, & D True

  • Thread starter Thread starter brake4country
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Work
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of work, energy, and friction in physics, specifically evaluating the truth of several statements regarding these topics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the validity of statements regarding work and energy conservation, questioning the implications of friction as a non-conservative force. There is an examination of how energy can be transformed and the role of heat in energy transfer.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided explanations and clarifications regarding the misconceptions about work and energy, particularly in relation to friction. Multiple interpretations of the statements are being discussed, with no explicit consensus reached on the correctness of each statement.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of conservative versus non-conservative forces and the implications of energy transfer in various scenarios, indicating a need for deeper understanding of these concepts.

brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7
Which of the following statements are true?
(A) No work is done on an object if that object remains stationary
(B) Work can only change the velocity or position of an object and not its temperature
(C) Energy is conserved when frictional forces are applied to an object
(D) Energy transfer as heat always accompanies friction

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I understand how A, B, and D are incorrect but I cannot figure out how C is correct. My reasoning is that friction is a nonconservative force, therefore, how can energy be conserved when friction is involved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is always conserved. What friction does is that it converts the "useful" form of energy (say kinetic energy) into "not useful" form of energy (which may be the dissipated heat, or the kinetic energy of air molecules). You cannot create or destroy energy. If a force is non-conservative, it simply means that the work done by that force will be dependent on the path taken by the object on which that force is acting, contrary to conservative forces whose work doesn't depend on the path taken by the object.
 
Ok. I understand now. A is wrong because a stationary object we may be neglecting PV work or some other type of energy on the system. B is wrong because an increase in internal energy will raise the temperature of object, and D is completely wrong because in the example of PV work, compression of a real gas will raise internal energy which can dissipate out into the environment without the use of friction.
 
Yes you are right. And all your explanations are correct.
However I am having a feeling that you are considering "heat" to be something that is of no important? Heat is just a way to transfer energy at the system boundary. It is not necessary that it always gets dissipated in the surrounding. Consider this, when you heat water, it gets converted to steam which can be used to run a turbine to produce electricity (that is what we do at a thermal power plant). So heat is always to be dissipated in the environment.
 
Thank you for the reply. Actually, I gave the example of heat transfer only as an example even though heat has broad applications. I think my confusion was the difference between conservative and non-conservative forces. There are many details in physics that when ignored can backfire when you don't fully understand. Thanks for answering my question!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K