Calc: Varying Rates & Area of Rectangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter skivail
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the rate of change of the area of a rectangle using calculus, specifically when the length decreases at 5 cm/sec and the width increases at 3 cm/sec. At an initial length of 100 cm and width of 50 cm, the area is determined to be increasing, with a rate of change of 50 cm²/s. The area A is expressed as a function of time, A = L(t) * W(t), and the chain rule is applied to derive the rate of change, dA/dt = L * dW/dt + W * dL/dt. The conclusion is that despite the length decreasing, the overall area increases due to the width's increase.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, particularly derivatives and the chain rule.
  • Familiarity with functions of time in mathematical modeling.
  • Basic knowledge of geometry, specifically properties of rectangles.
  • Ability to manipulate quadratic equations and interpret their derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in calculus with real-world examples.
  • Learn about quadratic functions and their properties, including differentiation.
  • Explore related rates problems in calculus for further practice.
  • Investigate the implications of negative values in geometric contexts, particularly in area calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for calculus exams, educators teaching related rates, and anyone interested in applying calculus to geometric problems.

skivail
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
please help explain, using calculus, to me for test on monday...

the length of a rectangle is decreasing at 5 cm/sec and the width is increasing at 3cm/sec. naive thinking would lead one to conclude that the area of the rectangle is decreasing becasue the length is decreasing faster than the width increases. is this conlcusion true of false at a time when the rectangle is 100 cm long and 50 cm wide? justify your answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you take x to be the time in seconds then you can work out two equations which tell you the height and width of the rectangle at any time. If you then multiply both of these equations together you can find the area of the rectangle at any time. You should end up with a quadratic that you can differentiate to find the rate of change of the area of the rectangle. You should then be able to see whether the area of the rectangle is decreasing or increasing. There would be a point where the length would start to increase again but your earlier equation for calculating the length at any time would show a negative value, which would lead to a negative area. You can't have negative areas...i think...so the way around that would be to say that you're only going to take the modulus of your area function, this means that you'd also take the modulus of your differentiated function i think.

Anyway hope that helps...
(please correct me if I'm wrong)
 
sanitykey said:
If you take x to be the time in seconds then you can work out two equations which tell you the height and width of the rectangle at any time. If you then multiply both of these equations together you can find the area of the rectangle at any time. You should end up with a quadratic that you can differentiate to find the rate of change of the area of the rectangle. You should then be able to see whether the area of the rectangle is decreasing or increasing...
You could do it that way, yes, but it's a bit fiddly.

The usual way of doing these types of problems, involving rates of change, is like this ...

A = L*W

where both L and W are functions of time. L = L(t) and W = W(t).

Using the chain rule,

dA/dt = L.dW/dt + W.dL/dt
dA/dt = 3L - 5H (using dW/dt = 3 cm/s and dL/dt = - 5 cm/s)

at L = 100 and W = 50,

dA/dt = 3*100 - 5*50 = 300 - 250
dA/dt = 50 cm²/s
=============

which is positive, so the area is actually increasing!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
29K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K