Calcuate Orbital Speed (without using distance)

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the orbital speed of a planet without using the distance of its path can be approached by utilizing other orbital parameters like the orbital period (T) and eccentricity (e). For nearly circular orbits, average orbital speed can be derived solely from the orbital period. It is suggested to refer to textbooks or reliable online resources for equations that relate these parameters. A solid understanding of fundamental orbital mechanics is essential for solving this problem effectively. Engaging with educational materials will enhance comprehension of these concepts.
ldv1452
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
How would I go about calculating the orbital speed of a planet without using the distance of its path. In other words, only using the motion around the plane of ecliptic?

My first thought was using the angle of the path somehow, but I'm a bit stumped here.

Thanks for any input!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming "distance of its path" is referring to the semi-major axis of the orbit, a, you can replace a with knowledge of other orbital parameters such as orbital period T and eccentricity e. Assuming further that e is close to zero (orbit is near circular) you can find average orbital speed as a function T alone. To do this you probably need to look for some equations in your textbooks that relate these parameters to each other and combine them, or you could read some of the references that come up when you search for "orbital speed" ... *cough* wikipedia *cough*
 
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I think I need a better understanding of some of these fundamental concepts before I can solve this.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top