Calculate "a" in c=sum_i( ( p(i)^a ) * b(i) ) / sum_i( p(i)^a )

  • Thread starter Thread starter dalves
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the variable "a" in the equation c = sum_i( ( p(i)^a ) * b(i) ) / sum_i( p(i)^a ), where "c", "b(i)", and probabilities "p(i)" are known. Participants express difficulty in understanding the equation without LaTeX formatting, leading to a reformulation of the equation for clarity. The key transformation noted is that it leads to the condition sum p_i^a(c-b_i) = 0. There is a consensus that additional data is necessary to analytically solve for "a". The conversation emphasizes the need for clearer notation and more information to proceed with the calculation.
dalves
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the following equation:

c = sum_i( ( p(i)^a ) * b(i) ) / sum_i( p(i)^a )

"c", "0 <= p(i) < 1" and "b(i)" are known.
How do I calculate "a"?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dalves said:
In the following equation:

c = sum_i( ( p(i)^a ) * b(i) ) / sum_i( p(i)^a )

"c", "0 <= p(i) < 1" and "b(i)" are known.
How do I calculate "a"?



It's really hard to understand what you really meant without LaTeX, but if you meant

\displaystyle{c=\frac{\sum p_i^a b_i}{\sum p_i^a}\Longrightarrow \sum p_i^a(c-b_i)=0} ...and this is as far as I can go without any further data.

DonAntonio
 
DonAntonio said:
It's really hard to understand what you really meant without LaTeX, but if you meant

\displaystyle{c=\frac{\sum p_i^a b_i}{\sum p_i^a}\Longrightarrow \sum p_i^a(c-b_i)=0} ...and this is as far as I can go without any further data.

DonAntonio

That is correct, I totally agree. The only further data is that "b(i)", "0 <= p(i) < 1" and "c" are known. I was hoping to be able to calculate "a" ... analytically.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top