Calculate an integral using euler substituition.

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Euler Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral \(\int\frac{dx}{x+\sqrt{x^2-x+1}}\) can be calculated using Euler substitution by expressing \(x\) in terms of a new variable \(t\). The transformation involves the equation \(\sqrt{x^2-x+1} = t - x\), leading to the expression \(x = \frac{t^2 - 1}{2t - 1}\). The differential \(dx\) is derived as \(dx = 2 \frac{t^2 - t + 1}{(2t - 1)^2} dt\). Substituting these into the original integral simplifies it to \(2 \int \frac{t^2 - t + 1}{(2t - 1)^2 t} dt\), which is a more manageable form for further evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with Euler substitution technique
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation and differential calculus
  • Experience with integrals involving square roots
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Euler substitution in various integral problems
  • Learn about advanced integration techniques, such as integration by parts
  • Explore the use of mathematical software like MathWorld for integral evaluation
  • Investigate the properties of square root functions in integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and integral evaluation, as well as educators seeking to enhance their teaching methods in advanced calculus topics.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i was asked to calculate the integral:
[tex]\int\frac{dx}{x+\sqrt{x^2-x+1}}[/tex] by using euler substituition (i.e, finding a line which intersects sqrt(x^2-x+1) through one point and then the equation of the line will be y-y0=t(x-x0) where (x0,y0) is one point of intersection, and then substituing x for a rational function of t.
i did so in this particular example but i got stuck.
so i tried to recheck it through mathworld's integrator, but it states there isn't such formula for this integral, is this correct?
obviously if it's integrator, so it must be. (-:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I'd do it this way, let t, such that:
[tex]\sqrt{x ^ 2 - x + 1} = t - x \quad (1)[/tex] or stated differently [tex]t = x + \sqrt{x ^ 2 - x + 1}[/tex]

Now, we'll square both sides of (1):
[tex]\Rightarrow x ^ 2 - x + 1 = t ^ 2 - 2xt + x ^ 2[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow - x + 1 = t ^ 2 - 2xt[/tex]

Isolate x's to one side, and we'll try to express x in terms of t:
[tex]\Rightarrow - x + 2xt = t ^ 2 - 1[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow x (2t - 1) = t ^ 2 - 1[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow x = \frac{t ^ 2 - 1}{2t - 1} \quad (2)[/tex]

Take the differential of both sides yields:

[tex]\Rightarrow dx = \frac{2 t ^ 2 -2t + 2}{(2t - 1) ^ 2} dt = 2 \frac{t ^ 2 - t + 1}{(2t - 1) ^ 2} dt \quad (3)[/tex]

Now substitute (1), (2), and (3) to your original integral, we'll have:
[tex]\int \frac{dx}{x + \sqrt{x ^ 2 - x + 1}} = 2 \int \frac{\frac{t ^ 2 - t + 1}{(2t - 1) ^ 2} dt}{t} = 2 \int \frac{t ^ 2 - t + 1}{(2t - 1) ^ 2 t} dt[/tex]
It looks much better than its original form, right?
Can you go from here? :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K