Calculate Dot Product of Nabla and Vector | Partial Derivative Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter dalarev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Nabla
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the dot product of the nabla operator and a vector using partial derivatives. The correct approach involves differentiating each component of the vector, which is expressed in Cartesian coordinates as (x/sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2), y/sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2), z/sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)). It is emphasized that the denominator, although a scalar, cannot be omitted as it is a function of the variables x, y, and z. The solution also highlights the potential complexity of converting to polar coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and the nabla operator
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of Cartesian and polar coordinate systems
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the nabla operator in vector calculus
  • Learn how to convert expressions between Cartesian and polar coordinates
  • Explore advanced differentiation techniques in multivariable calculus
  • Investigate the implications of scalar functions in vector operations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and require a solid understanding of the nabla operator and partial derivatives.

dalarev
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Divergence, nabla

Homework Statement



Given the vector, find the dot product.

Homework Equations



dot product of nabla and the vector is just partial derivative of each component.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm trying to figure out if I can just leave out the denominator, since it is a scalar (the magnitude of vector r). The answer, however, is 2/r , so I'm starting to think it's going to be necessary to change to plane polar coordinates.
 

Attachments

  • divergence.gif
    divergence.gif
    813 bytes · Views: 560
Physics news on Phys.org
While the denominator is a scalar, it is still a function of x, y, and z. No, you certainly cannot leave it out. You could write the vector as
\left(\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^+ z^2}}, \frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^+ z^2}},\frac{z}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^+ z^2}}\right)
and differentiate the three components of that with respect to x, y, and z, respectively and then add.

While the vector might be simpler in polar coordinates, you would also have to rewrite the operator in polar coordinates- and that is not trivial. Differentiating with respect to x, y, and z is not that difficult. Just write the first component as x(x^2+ y^2+ z^2)^{1/2} and differentiate with respect to x. You can then use "symmetry" to just write down the other derivatives, swapping the coordinates as appropriate.
 
HallsofIvy said:
While the denominator is a scalar, it is still a function of x, y, and z. No, you certainly cannot leave it out. You could write the vector as
\left(\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^+ z^2}}, \frac{y}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^+ z^2}},\frac{z}{\sqrt{x^2+ y^+ z^2}}\right)
and differentiate the three components of that with respect to x, y, and z, respectively and then add.

While the vector might be simpler in polar coordinates, you would also have to rewrite the operator in polar coordinates- and that is not trivial. Differentiating with respect to x, y, and z is not that difficult. Just write the first component as x(x^2+ y^2+ z^2)^{1/2} and differentiate with respect to x. You can then use "symmetry" to just write down the other derivatives, swapping the coordinates as appropriate.

Thank you for that, exactly what I needed. The rest is just repetitive differentiation, thanks for the help. /solved
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K