Calculate Heating Time of Object with Radiation

Click For Summary
To calculate the heating time of an inner cylinder using radiation, the energy emitted must equal the energy absorbed, leading to the equation involving the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. As the inner cylinder heats up, the energy transfer rate decreases, complicating the calculation of time to reach a target temperature. Numerical methods, such as those implemented in spreadsheets, are recommended for solving the resulting non-linear differential equation. Approximations can provide analytic estimates, particularly when the temperature differences are small compared to the average temperatures involved. Understanding these methods can help in effectively determining heating times in thermal systems.
tjosan
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Hello.

I want to calculate how long time it takes to heat an object with radiation. The object is the inner cylinder of two concentric cylinders. The inner cylinder is not hollow. If assuming black body:

\dot{Q}_E=\sigma A_1(T_1^4-T(t)^4) [1]

Energy emitted must the same as the energy absorbed for the inner cylinder. I want the inner cylinder to reach temperature T_2 (T_2<T_1).
So the total energy needed for for inner cylinder is given by:

q=C_p(T_2-T(t))m [2]

However, as can be seen, as the temperature of the inner cylinder increase, \dot{Q_E} ([2]) will decrease.

So how do I calculate how long time it will take for it to reach T_2?

Assumptions:
Black body
Inner cylinder has uniform temperature, i.e. surface temperature = core temperature at all times.
 
Science news on Phys.org
$$mC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=\sigma A_1(T_1^4-T^4)$$
subject to some initial condition on T
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
To actually solve for the answer though, I'd use a numerical method in a spreadsheet to avoid dealing with the differential equation directly.
 
russ_watters said:
To actually solve for the answer though, I'd use a numerical method in a spreadsheet to avoid dealing with the differential equation directly.
I think what you're saying is that, because the equation is non-linear in T, one needs to integrate the differential equation numerically. Am I interpreting what you're saying correctly?
 
I'm not sure if one "needs to", I'm just saying I would: the equation looks fine, I'm just not sure if the OP is going to know what to do with it. I vaguely recall solving such equations for T or t back in college (this is a modified version of Newton's Law of Cooling, which was a specific example used), but would avoid it today.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters said:
I'm not sure if one "needs to", I'm just saying I would: the equation looks fine, I'm just not sure if the OP is going to know what to do with it. I vaguely recall solving such equations for T or t back in college (this is a modified version of Newton's Law of Cooling, which was a specific example used), but would avoid it today.
During my career, this kind of thing was my "bread and butter."

There are some good approximations that can be made to obtain an analytic estimate, depending on the initial temperature T0 and the final temperature T2. If (T2-T0) is small compared to both (T2+T0)/2 and to T1-T2, then the right hand side of the equation can be evaluated at Tave = (T2+T0)/2. The heating time then becomes:
$$t=\frac{\sigma A_1(T_1^4-T_{ave}^4)}{mC_p(T_2-T_0)}$$
A better approximation is obtained by first factoring the right hand side of the differential equation:
$$mC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=\sigma A_1(T_1^2+T^2)(T_1+T)(T_1-T)$$
If we then substitute Tave for T in the first two parentheses, we obtain:
$$mC_p\frac{dT}{dt}=h_{ave} A_1(T_1-T)\tag{1}$$
where have is the average heat transfer coefficient, given by:
$$h_{ave}=\sigma (T_1^2+T_{ave}^2)(T_1+T_{ave})$$
Eqn. 1 is the standard Newton's cooling linear heat transfer equation that is readily solved analytically:
$$\frac{T_1-T_2}{T_1-T_0}=e^{-\frac{h_{ave}A_1}{mC_p}t}$$

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
The exact analytic solution to this problem can also be obtained by grouping the temperature terms on one side of the equation and using partial fractions. I'm just too lazy to do it.

Chet
 
Thank you for the answers!
Chestermiller said:
The exact analytic solution to this problem can also be obtained by grouping the temperature terms on one side of the equation and using partial fractions. I'm just too lazy to do it.
Chet

I have another question! I also found that you can use this aproach: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html
When and Why would you do it this way?
 
tjosan said:
Thank you for the answers!
I have another question! I also found that you can use this aproach: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/cootime.html
When and Why would you do it this way?
That link inherently assumes that it is a monoatomic gas that is cooling (because of the expression used for the heat capacity), and it assumes that the temperature of the body it is radiating to is at 0 K (absolute zero).

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
721
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K