Calculate Interferometer Fringe-Shifts for 10.0cm Chamber with 600-nm Light

  • Thread starter Thread starter cuti_pie75
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the fringe shifts in a Michelson Interferometer with a 10.0cm chamber and 600-nm light, the refractive index of air (1.00029) is considered. The initial calculation involves determining the number of wavelengths in the chamber, which is done by using the formula m = 2xn/λo, resulting in 333430 wavelengths. When the air is evacuated, the refractive index changes to 1, necessitating a subtraction of the wavelengths encountered in air from those in a vacuum. This difference directly correlates to the number of fringe shifts observed. The discussion confirms that the approach to the problem is correct and provides clarity on the calculation process.
cuti_pie75
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Suppose we place a chamber 10.0cm long with flat parallel windows in one arm of a Michelson Interferometer that is being illuminated by 600-nm light. If the refractive index of air is 1.00029 and all the air is pumped out of the cell, how many fringe-pairs will shift by in the process?

for this problem, i can't visualize the design of the interferometer at all. All I'm thinking is that m=finge-pairs?, so m=2xn/λo = 333430?

Any help would be good...at least let me know if I'm going to the right direction or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your in the right direction, you calculated the number of wavelengths found when traversing the length of the chamber, twice. Now just subtract the number of wavelengths you would encounter by evacuating the chamber. (Index = 1) This will give you the change in wavelengths which happens to be the number of fringe changes. Hope this helps.
 
thanx a lot jisland85...i understand now. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top