Calculate Kinetic Energy in Elastic and Non-Elastic Collisions

AI Thread Summary
In a non-elastic collision involving two spheres of equal mass (0.3 kg), the first sphere collides with a stationary second sphere, resulting in speeds of 0.6 m/s and 1.1 m/s, respectively. The kinetic energy before and after the collision was calculated, revealing that 0.2 J of kinetic energy transformed into heat. The discussion highlights confusion regarding whether the collision is elastic or inelastic, with clarification that elastic collisions do not convert kinetic energy into heat. Participants confirm the calculations align with the principles of inelastic collisions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying the type of collision for accurate energy transformation analysis.
EPhoenix
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
NONElastic Collision

Homework Statement



One sphere collides with other sphere that has speed of u2 = 0... Both spheres have same mass (m1 = m2 = 0.3 kg)... After collision first sphere has speed of v1 = 0.6 m/s, second sphere v2 = 1.1 m/s ... How much of kinetic energy has been transformed into heat

Homework Equations



Ek= (m1 * u1 ^2) / 2

m1u1 + m2u2 = m1v1 + m2v2


The Attempt at a Solution



from second formula i got u1 = 1.7 m/s

and after doing Ek = Ek1 + Ek2 + heat,

heat = Ek - Ek1 + Ek2
heat = 0.2 J



Can anybody confirm this...7
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
EPhoenix said:

Homework Statement



How much of kinetic energy has been transformed into heat

If the collision is elastic, as you say in the title, you don't need any more data to answer this question.
 
yeah i know... elastic collision do not transfer heat and stuff...

so it will be 0

BUT proffesor told my GF (she took that exam) that there is solution and it's not 0

dunno how, but I guess then he meant nonelastic but wrote elastic...
 
Here... I will edit it...
 
Well if the collision is inelastic, I get the same answer as you do, to 2 sig fig. As long as it isn't a trick question!
 
If it was for me, i wouldn't ask here... but this is girls be or not be exam...

Any more thoughts?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top