Calculate Limit of Series: Find $\displaystyle\lim_{k\to\infty}\frac{n_k}{d_k}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter sennyk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the limit of the ratio of two sequences, n_k and d_k, defined recursively, with initial values n_0 = 2 and d_0 = 1. The limit is expected to converge to the golden ratio, (1 + √5)/2. Participants explore the relationship between the sequences, noting that they resemble Fibonacci numbers. A key equation derived is x = 1 + 1/(1 + 1/x), which leads to the continued fraction representation of the golden ratio. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical process to arrive at the limit, confirming the connection to Fibonacci series properties.
sennyk
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I want to calculate the following:

<br /> \displaystyle\lim_{k\to\infty}\frac{n_k}{d_k}<br />
where,
<br /> n_0 = 2<br />
<br /> d_0 = 1<br />
<br /> n_k = 2n_k_-_1 +d_k_-_1<br />
<br /> d_k = n_k_-_1 + d_k_-_1<br />

For the life of me I have no idea how to do this. By the way, the answer is supposed to be
\frac{1 + \sqrt{5}}{2}

This is not a homework problem. I was doing an electrical engineering problem and to solve the problem this series was magically solved.

Please any help is appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm intrigued... as the answer it is supposed to be is the golden ratio.
 
Okay, you may proceed as follows:
\frac{n_{k}}{d_{k}}=\frac{2n_{k-1}+d_{k-1}}{n_{k-1}+d_{k-1}}=1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{d_{k-1}}{n_{k-1}}}

Assuming that a limit exists as k (and therefore k-1) trundles off into infinity, call that limit "x".

Thus, you get the equation,
which ought to be easily solved.
x=1+\frac{1}{1+\frac{1}{x}}

Note that this is simply another way of writing the continued fractions representation of the golden ratio.
 
Last edited:
Another way to proceed, would be to first solve for the one sequence, then for the seconde, and finally solve for the limiting ratio.

We can start with rearranging the second equation:
n_{k-1}=d_{k}-d_{k-1}\to{n_{k}=d_{k+1}-d_{k}(*)

Inserting these relations into the first, we get:
d_{k+1}-d_{k}=2(d_{k}-d_{k-1})+d_{k-1}\to{d}_{k+1}-3d_{k}+d_{k-1}=0
Noting from (*) that we have d_{0}=1,d_{1}=3, you should be able to solve for the d-sequence.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top