MHB Calculate $r,s,t$ in $\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{\sqrt[3]{2} - 1}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the numbers \( r, s, t \) such that \( \sqrt[3]{\sqrt[3]{2} - 1} = \sqrt[3]{r} + \sqrt[3]{s} + \sqrt[3]{t} \) with \( r, s, t \in \mathbb{Q} \). A participant confirmed the solution as \( r = \frac{1}{9}, s = -\frac{2}{9}, t = \frac{4}{9} \). This was found through trial and error, and the correctness can be verified by cubing both sides of the equation. The discussion also touches on the origin of the problem, with inquiries about its source. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying solutions in mathematical problems.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Calculate number $r,s,t$ in $\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{\sqrt[3]{2} - 1} = \sqrt[3]{r} + \sqrt[3]{s} + \sqrt[3]{t}$

where $r,s,t \in Q$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
Calculate number $r,s,t$ in $\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{\sqrt[3]{2} - 1} = \sqrt[3]{r} + \sqrt[3]{s} + \sqrt[3]{t}$

where $r,s,t \in Q$

Hi jacks, :)

Can you please tell me where you encountered this problem? Is this a equation that you obtained as a consequence of your research/project, or is it a question from a book?

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
jacks said:
Calculate number $r,s,t$ in $\displaystyle \sqrt[3]{\sqrt[3]{2} - 1} = \sqrt[3]{r} + \sqrt[3]{s} + \sqrt[3]{t}$

where $r,s,t \in Q$
I found that $ \sqrt[3]{\mathstrut\sqrt[3]{2} - 1} = \sqrt[3]{\frac19} + \sqrt[3]{-\frac29} + \sqrt[3]{\frac49}$. I did this more or less by trial and error, so the method is not very revealing. But you can verify that it is correct by cubing both sides.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top