Calculate Speed of Car in Car Accident

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the speed of a car involved in an accident can be challenging due to multiple unknown factors. The distance from the impact point to where the car stopped and the mass of both vehicles are key data points, but they alone may not provide an exact speed. Estimations can be made using physics equations, such as vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad, where final velocity is known to be 0 m/s. The absence of skid marks complicates the analysis, as they typically help determine speed. Ultimately, while rough estimates are possible, precise calculations require additional information about the force of impact.
gca114
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Recently I have been involved in a car accident, and would like to figure out what was the speed of the other car that crashed into us.

I only have two figures, the distance from the point of impact to where the car stopped and the mass (of both cars); and also, the final velocity which is 0 m/s.

Does someone think that this is possible to figure the speed of the other car that crashed into us?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Too many unknown factors for getting an exact answer.

Some rough estimates can be possible.

Please search forum, this question is asked every few months.
 
gca114 said:
Recently I have been involved in a car accident, and would like to figure out what was the speed of the other car that crashed into us.

I only have two figures, the distance from the point of impact to where the car stopped and the mass (of both cars); and also, the final velocity which is 0 m/s.

Does someone think that this is possible to figure the speed of the other car that crashed into us?

I think the police use the skidmarks of the tyres to work out the speed at which the car was travelling. And other stuff. They probably have the best estimate of anyone.
 
There were no skidmarks.. as there was not a chance for breaks.. also.. it wasn't a collision crash... both cars separated from each other after the crash..
 
Well let's see. You can use the equation vf^2=vi^2 +2ad
you have vf, you say that you have distance, you don't have acceleration but if you knew with how much force the car hit you with you can figure out accelartion from F=MA and then you can find Vi. Therefor if you can figure out the force of impact it can be done. This of course would be an estimate as some other factors are involved.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top