Calculate the pH of concentrated hydrochloric acid

  • Thread starter Thread starter a.a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid Ph
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the pH of concentrated hydrochloric acid (24.8% by weight, density 1.16 g/mL), first convert the percentage to grams per milliliter, yielding approximately 0.3248 g/mL of HCl. This leads to the calculation of moles of HCl, resulting in 0.0789 moles per liter, equating to a molarity of 7.89M. The pH is then calculated as -0.897 using the formula pH = -log([H+]). However, it is noted that for such concentrated solutions, pH cannot be accurately determined using this method. The discussion emphasizes the limitations of pH calculations in highly concentrated acid solutions.
a.a
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the pH of concentrated hydrochloric acid if this solution is 24.8 % HCl by weight and has a density of 1.16 g/mL.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


\the percentage is throwing me of, can someone explain what it is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I'm wildly guessing here, but if "percent by weight" somehow is supposed to mean "percent by mass," it would make things pretty easy; in 1.16g/mL, 28% of 1.16g would be HCl: (1.16g/mL)(0.28) = 0.3248g/mL.

From there, you can do some converting to eventually get to pH; I'll assume for now that only the percentage was tripping you up.
 


hey, useing what u told me i think i mite be getting somewhere:

n HCl = (0.248)*(1.16g)/(36.453g/mole) = 0.0789 moles

The molar concentration is thus [HCl] = (0.00789 moles)/(0.001 lit)

= 7.89M = [H+]

pH = -log([H+]) = -0.897

can someone verify?
 


Yes and no. Yes - you did your best and that's probably what your teacher wants. No - in such concentrated solutions pH can't be calculated this way. But that's not your fault and you can't do anything about it.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top