Chemistry Calculate the pressure-volume work for the given reaction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating pressure-volume work for a reaction involving water, noting that water is a liquid and not an ideal gas. Participants mention the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) but recognize its inapplicability to liquids. The focus shifts to the formula for work, emphasizing the need for initial and final volumes to proceed with calculations. There is a call for more specific information about the volumes involved in the reaction. The conversation highlights the necessity of knowing the volume of water produced and the reactants to solve the problem effectively.
anjauk2003
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
New user has been reminded to always show their work on schoolwork problems.
Homework Statement
Assume that 2.00 moles of water are formed according to the following reaction at constant
pressure (101.3 kPa) and constant temperature (298 K):
I have to calculate the pressure-volume work for the given reaction and i really dont know how to start or what to use. Can someone help me?
Relevant Equations
2 H2(g) + O2(g) --> 2 H2O(l)
I dont have an solution Attempt. Maybe something with PV=nRT but this is for ideal gas and H2O is liquid. An other formula they introduced us to is: dE=-P*V
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anjauk2003 said:
dE=-P*V

If it is about work more like P*dV.

What is the initial volume of the mixture, and what is the final volume?
 
Borek said:
If it is about work more like P*dV.

What is the initial volume of the mixture, and what is the final volume?
That's the problem. I dont have more information. I wrote down everything i got.
 
You have everything you need. What is volume of water produced? What reacted?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top