Calculate the resolution in linear travel of the tape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the resolution in linear travel of a tape driven by a 24V DC motor with an optical encoder. The resolution is determined to be 0.2mm per pulse, based on the motor's pulley diameter and encoder divisions. The tape velocity is calculated at 2.8009 m/s, derived from the motor's speed at 24V. The accuracy of the velocity measurement is questioned, particularly regarding the smallest deviation the encoder can detect. It is suggested that the counter/timer's limitations in counting may affect the precision of the velocity measurement, indicating a need to establish a tolerance band based on the closest measurable revolutions per second.
polyperson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Nobody replying, so I’ve reframed the question

A 24V DC motor has an optical encoder with 500 divisions which outputs the pulse frequency to an electronic counter/timer. The motor has a flat pulley of 31.827mm diameter used as a tape drive.

(a) Calculate the resolution in linear travel of the tape

(b) Determine the velocity of the tape if the motor is supplied with 24V

(c) To what accuracy can the velocity be determined?


Right (a) is simple:

Resolution = smallest distance that can be measured = linear travel of the tape per revolution divided by the number of pulses per revolution

Circumference = pi x 31.827 = 100mm

Therefore, Resolution = 100 ÷ 500 = 0.2mm per pulse

For (b) I had to use the Motor speed vs. voltage graph that we had to create as part of the experiment. I ended up with a value of 1608.56 rev/min which is 28.009 rev/s, so:

28.009 rev/sec x 100e-3m = 2.8009 m/s

But on (c) I am stuck. It's not very clear what he is asking. I think he means what is the smallest deviation from 2.8009 m/s that the encoder can measure.

Is the answer along the lines of:

If the counter/timer can't count in fractions of 1Hz (and that's merely an assumption) then surely it couldn't measure 28.009 rev/sec...so you need to find the number of rev/sec closest to 28.009 that it can measure and double it to give a tolerance band?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ping upwards
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top