MHB Calculate third point from 2 points and an angle

AI Thread Summary
To calculate a third point from two given points and an angle, the discussion outlines a method for rotating the second point around the first point. The formula provided involves using trigonometric functions to determine the new coordinates based on the specified angle. The calculations for the new point (Cx, Cy) are confirmed to correctly represent the rotation of the second point around the first. This approach effectively allows for determining the position of the third point at the desired angle. The method is validated as accurate for the intended purpose.
GamerVSL
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having a hard time putting together a formula. I have 2 points (x0, y0) and (x1, y1) and an angle (k).
Using this information I need to calculate a third point that is k degrees from the previous 2 points.
View attachment 7880
Is it possible to do that? Thank you for your attention.
 

Attachments

  • problema_code.jpg
    problema_code.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 99
Mathematics news on Phys.org
From your diagram, it looks as though the point C is found by rotating (x1,y1) about (x0,y0) by an angle of x degrees. Is this what you want? If so, there are standard ways of doing this problem. If you need further help on this, post again.
 
I found a method:

Cx=cos(θ)⋅(X1−X0)−sin(θ)⋅(Y1−Y0)+X0
Cy=sin(θ)⋅(X1−X0)+cos(θ)⋅(Y1−Y0)+Y1

Is it right?
 
Yes, this rotates (x1,y1) about (x0,y0) through an angle of $\theta$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top