Calculating Airplane Speed Using Time Dilation

AI Thread Summary
An airplane traveling 3000 km at a constant speed v experiences time dilation, where the pilot measures flight time as Δt and a stationary observer measures it as Δt', with Δt' being greater than Δt. The difference between these times is given as |Δt - Δt'| = 4 ns, leading to the need to determine the airplane's speed. Attempts to solve the equation involving the Lorentz factor γ have resulted in complex equations that are difficult to simplify. A suggestion is made to express Δt' in terms of v and the distance traveled, but this leads to a quadratic equation that complicates the solution. The known answer is 240 m/s, but the method to derive it remains elusive for the participants.
davesface
Messages
97
Reaction score
2
An airplane travels at a constant speed v for a distance of 3000km as measured by a stationary observer. The pilot measures the flight time to be \Delta t and the stationary observer measures the flight time to be \Delta t'. (Then I solved the first part of it, showing that \Delta t' > \Delta t.)

b. If \left|\Delta t-\Delta t' \right|=4ns, determine the speed of the airplane.

Now, I have tried every combination of plugging equations into one another that I could think of, and I always end up with some horrifically complicated equation in which it's impossible to solve for v. Suggestions on how to proceed from \gamma\Delta t -\Delta t=4ns

PS- The answer is 240m/s, but I cannot see at all how to get there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you state the whole problem as it is given, including part (a)? To check your work and help you out, we need to have all the information that you have.
 
a. Which time interval is longer? (As I said, I already showed that the t'>t)
 
So you know Δt in terms of γ. Is there another way you can calculate Δt by first finding an expression for Δt' in terms of v and 3000 km?
 
Well, I can use \Delta t=\frac{\Delta x}{v} to say that \Delta t'=\gamma \frac{3,000,000}{v}, but then that leads to an equation with a v2 and a v term.
 
After 2 pages of fruitless attempts, I've decided to give up and hope for partial credit.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top