Calculating Angle Between Ecliptic and Horizon for Observer at 18 Degrees North

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frank Einstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Spherical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angle between the ecliptic and the horizon for an observer located at 18 degrees north latitude, specifically when the point of Aries is obscured. The initial approach involved using Stellarium to measure the angle, yielding a result of approximately 84 degrees, which aligns closely with a calculated value of 84.5 degrees derived from the formula 90 - 23.5 + 18. Participants suggest visualizing the scenario with sketches to clarify the geometric relationships involved, particularly the intersection of the ecliptic and equatorial planes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of constructing accurate diagrams to better understand the angles and relationships in this celestial context. Overall, the thread seeks a method to justify the calculated angle effectively.
Frank Einstein
Messages
166
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Which is the angle between the ecliptic and the horizon in the moment that the point of Aries is hiding for an observer whose position is 18 degrees north?

2. Homework Equations

None

The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I have tried to is to do a drawing of the situation: here it is: http://postimg.org/image/dh3xkvipv/

Then I went to the software stellarium and I put the observer exactly at 18 degrees north; found a star with zero right ascension and I went forward in time until the star had height zero; then, I measured the difference between the north and the ecliptic and I got about 84 degrees: http://postimg.org/image/vs1i12dwp/.

If I calculate 90-23.5+18 I get 84.5, which is similat to the 84 that I got with the aproximate calculus at stellarium, but I don't know how to justify it.

Can anyone thell me if there is a way to calculate the angle between the ecliptic and the horizon in the moment that the point of Aries is hiding for an observer whose position is known?

Thanks for reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think if you make a sketch where you're looking edge-on at the intersection of the ecliptic and equatorial planes (so the planes appear as two crossed lines and you the observer are looking on from the first point of Aries), and you center their intersection in the center of a circle representing the Earth in profile, then you should be able to convince yourself that Aries first "hides" for all points on the circle to the right of the N-S line of the Earth.
 
I agree with you; I have made that with stellarium, is the second link; what I don't know is how to prove that the angle between the horizon and the ecliptic is 84.5 degrees
 
If, on the same diagram, you draw in the line of latitude for 18° it will be a line parallel to the line representing the equatorial plane. Draw a line from the center of the Earth circle to where that latitude line intersects the circle, and construct a perpendicular to that line there (it will be tangent to the circle). See any angles and triangles that might be of use?
 
  • Like
Likes Frank Einstein
Yeah, I will try with that, thank you very much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top