Calculating Angle Between Vectors G & F

dudu3060
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have some question guys

i have four points in the x,y plane in cartesian coordinates.

A (Ax,Ay)
B(Bx,By)

C(Cx,Cy)
D(Dx,Dy)

A and B is vector G
C and D is vector F

I would like to know what is the equation to get the angle between those two vectors (G,F) . and what are the limitations of this equation.

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the dot product? The angle ##\theta## between two vectors G and F satisfies ##G\cdot F=|G||F|\cos\theta##.

When we're dealing with vectors in ##\mathbb R^2## or ##\mathbb R^3##, this is a theorem. It holds for all pairs of vectors in those spaces. When we're dealing with an arbitrary inner product space over ##\mathbb R##, we can instead take ##\langle G,F\rangle=\|G\|\|F\|\cos\theta## as the definition of "the angle between G and F". (If you don't know what that means, don't worry about it. These terms are explained in courses on linear algebra). This works because the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality ensures that
$$\frac{\langle G,F\rangle}{\|G\|\|F\|}\leq 1$$ for all G and F.

This isn't a textbook-style question, and it doesn't involve physics, so I'm moving it to linear algebra.
 
thank you!but..

it is for excel chart.
i don't know how to make the vectors for the equation when i use cartesian coordinate.
i mean how do i make the vector G from A(Ax,Ay) and B(Bx,By)
can someone write it down for me.

thank you !
 
##G=B-A=(B_x,B_y)-(A_x,A_y)=(B_x-A_x,B_y-A_y)##
 
sorry again.

How do i make the last one to the dot product equation?

the vector G is not a number now but set of coordinates . again sorry but i am a novice and i need full explanation from start to end

thank you, youre a life saver

the dude
 
Is this what you mean?
$$G\cdot F=(B_x-A_x,B_y-A_y)\cdot (D_x-C_x,D_y-C_y) =(B_x-A_x)(D_x-C_x)+(B_y-A_y)(D_y-C_y)$$ The norm ##\|v\|## of a vector ##v=(x,y)## is defined by ##\|v\|=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}##.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top