Calculating Apparent Weight on a Rotor Ride

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the apparent weight of a 30-kg child on a rotor ride, with specific parameters such as a 3 m radius and a rotation speed of 0.4 revolutions per second. The initial calculation determined the child's velocity as 7.54 m/s and suggested that the apparent weight equals the normal force (FN) at 568.5 N. However, the correct approach incorporates both the normal force and gravitational force, leading to an apparent weight of 640 N when calculated using the resultant force formula. The importance of considering friction and the normal force in relation to the child’s apparent weight is emphasized, clarifying the role of these forces in the scenario. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately determining apparent weight in rotational motion contexts.
LesterTU
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 30-kg child is on a rotor ride at a carnival. The radius of the rotor is 3 m and it completes 0.4 revolutions in one second. The coefficient of static friction is 0.6. What is the magnitude of the child's apparent weight?

rotor1.png

Homework Equations


ΣFx : FN = mv2/r
ΣFy : Ff = Fg

The Attempt at a Solution


First I need to find v:
0.4 revolutions per second is equivalent to one revolution per 2.5 s, so T = 2.5 s.
v = 2πr / T => v = 7.54 m/s.

Since the apparent weight is the magnitude of the resultant force exerted on a body by a supporting surface, the way I see it FN is the only force that fits this description so I figured
apparent weight = FN = mv2/r = 568.5 N.

However the solution given by the author says that
apparent weight = (FN2 + Fg2)1/2 = 640 N.

I've been trying to understand why mg plays a role in the child's apparent weight but I don't see how in this case
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to PF!

Are you sure that FN is the only force exerted on the person by the wall? Consider the forces shown in your figure.
 
Thanks!

I guess the friction applies in this case but for some reason because of its direct relationship with the normal force I didn't consider it. It makes a lot of sense though now that I think about it
 
OK, good.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top