Calculating Area on Sphere: Unit Sphere & Rings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vrbic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Sphere
Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18
How to calculate some general area on a sphere for simplicity the unit sphere. Let's say I have a ball and I draw a ring on it. What is its area? I guess I need some initial point (some coordinate). Let's take a spherical coordinates with r=1. Element of area is \sin(\theta) d \theta d \phi. But how to define (describe) a ring? I guess I need some function \theta(\phi) and than integrate over ...what, all or some separate region of \phi? Or what would you suggest?

Thank you for your advice and help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can always construct a new coordinate system with the z-axis passing through the center of the sphere and the center of the circle on the surface of the sphere. Given that the sphere has radius R, a "circle" of radius r with center on the z-axis is given by \phi= \frac{2\pi r}{R}. The area of that circle is
\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_0^{\frac{2\pi r}{R}} sin(\theta)d\phi d\theta.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You can always construct a new coordinate system with the z-axis passing through the center of the sphere and the center of the circle on the surface of the sphere. Given that the sphere has radius R, a "circle" of radius r with center on the z-axis is given by \phi= \frac{2\pi r}{R}. The area of that circle is
\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_0^{\frac{2\pi r}{R}} sin(\theta)d\phi d\theta.
Thank you for your post, I understand , but it was just example, the ring on the ball. I would like to have some procedure for general case of area.
 
For the general case, because the boundary of the area may be strange, I thing numerical approximation is a feasible that can be considered.
 
tommyxu3 said:
For the general case, because the boundary of the area may be strange, I thing numerical approximation is a feasible that can be considered.
I agree with numerical aprox., but I have to know some theoretical base.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top