Calculating Break Adherence for Employees with Multiple Breaks

  • Thread starter Thread starter stoey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Computing
AI Thread Summary
To calculate break adherence for employees with multiple breaks, the formula needs to account for the total break time taken versus the allowed break time. The employee's total break time is calculated by summing the durations of each break taken. The adherence percentage should then reflect how the actual break time compares to the paid break time of 1.25 hours. If the total break time exceeds the paid break time, the excess should reduce the adherence score. Adjusting the formula to account for this excess will yield a more accurate adherence percentage.
stoey
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
hi math wizards,

a simple problem i have...work time is 8.5 hours while paid break is 1.25...paid break is divided into 3 parts 0.5, 0.25 and 0.5...any body knows how to compute the adherance to this? the goal of this problem is to compute the break adherance of an employee. An employee has 3 breaks that is 30 minutes (0.5) 15 minutes (0.25) and another last break of 30 minutes (0.5). if an employee's record on 1st break is like start is 11:30 AM and ends at 12:00 PM then the difference of the time is 30 minutes...therefore if his time is 30 minutes then he should get 100% on that particular break...so the same goes with the other break parts...overall an average of the total 3 break is the final mark..so if the employee's break scores are all 100% then he gets final score of 100%... I am not sure how to derive a formula on this... all i have is Adherence=work time minus paid break divided by work time...but i am not getting a 100% score when computing it...

regards,

stoey
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
stoey said:
Adherence=work time minus paid break divided by work time
That can't be correct. Are you sure it's not work time (t) plus paid break (b) divided by total time at work (or they are supposed to be at work) (w) or something? A = (t+b)/w

So if the work time (from what I can tell of your work up) is 8.5 (=t) hours, the paid break is 1.25 (=b), and the total time at work is 9.75 (=w) then you have:

A = (8.5 + 1.25)/9.75 = 1 (so multiply by 100 if you want percent)

Then set t and b to the times worked. I'm not a math "wizard", so the percentages for break and work may have to be set also, but seems like it might be at least closer to what you are looking for.
 
hi cone,

thanks for the quick reply:

if i have 3 parts break then how would the formula be then? will it stays as like this? since break is divided into Break1: 30 minutes (0.5), Break2: 15 minutes (0.25) and Break3: 30 minutes (0.5)...then formula would be like: A=8.5+0.5 / 9.75 for break1, then A=8.5+0.25 / 9.75 for break2, then A=8.5+0.5 / 9.75 for break3? well tried this formula with the following values:
break 1
IN:11:30 AM OUT: 12:00PM DIFFERENCE:0:30 or 0.5
break 2
IN:1:45 PM OUT: 2:00PM DIFFERENCE:0:30 or 0.25
break 3
IN:4:00 PM OUT: 4:35PM DIFFERENCE:0:35 or 0.58

TOTAL DIFFERENCE IS 1.33

then using the formula A=8.5+1.33/9.75 gives me 100.8547009 percent...this should not exceed 100% it should however decrease since the total paid break is only 1.25 and in excess of this paid break should be a deduction to the total 100% score...sorry for being a pain but i hope you can help me with this...i appreciate your efforts..

regards,

stoey
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top