Calculating Conditional Probability for a given Event (a=1)

hughwf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

This question relates to Bayes law. I think my problem is I am not sure of the name of the thing I am trying to derive...

I have 2 variables a and b.
a = 1 or 0, b = 0...n
I have the data to calculate;
p(a = 1 and b) p(b)
for any b. Hence I can find p(a=1|b) = p(a = 1 and b)/p(b)

What I want is p(a=1|b), but 'given' that a = 1. I don't want this to be affected by p(b), hence I am not trying to find p(b|a=1).
To explain further what i mean; If event a = 1, what is the prob it will happen at a certain b, independant of the frequency of occurences of different b's.

So I normalise;
\sum_{b = 0}^n p(a=1|b).N = 1

Where N is a constant.

N = \frac{1}{\sum_{b = 0}^n p(a=1|b) }

p(a=1,b) = \frac{p(a=1|b)}{\sum_{b = 0}^n p(a=1|b)}

is that alright and does it have a name?

Many thanks in advance for any advice...

Hugh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to Bayes' Law p[a|B]p = p[a,B] = p[B|a]p[a]; in order for your formula to be Bayesian it must conform with this.

EnumaElish
___________________________________________
I would definitely have logged in as EnumaElish had PF administration awarded that account the privilege of posting replies, after I reset my e-mail address Tuesday, October 28, 2008.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top