Calculating Consistency of a Point Mass System w/ Dark Matter

  • Thread starter Thread starter hilbert2
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a point mass system with both visible and dark matter, the gravitational interactions cause observable inconsistencies with Newton's laws for the visible masses. Observers can calculate the necessary number of dark matter point masses to achieve self-consistency, along with their masses and trajectories, although unique solutions may not always exist. The concept of a dark matter halo surrounding galaxies helps explain the observed rotational motion of visible matter. To deduce the density distribution of dark matter, one can compare the required centripetal force for circular motion with the gravitational force from visible mass, attributing any discrepancies to dark matter. This method allows for estimating the mass of the dark matter distribution effectively.
hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
Suppose we have a point mass system that consists of ##m + n## particles. There are ##m## normal visible point masses and ##n## invisible "dark matter" point masses. The point masses interact gravitationally with a ##1/r## potential.

Now when someone observes the motion of the visible masses, he will notice that they are not consistent with Newton's laws of motion (of course, because the invisible masses perturb the trajectories of the visible masses).

The question is, can such an observer calculate how many dark matter point masses there must be in the observed system to make the system self-consistent, and what are their masses and trajectories? In what cases a unique solution exists to this problem?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I probably didn't express this clearly enough... (English isn't my native language) I have seen that the observed rotational motion of galaxies is explained with a hypothesis that there is a "halo" of dark matter around all galaxies. How does one deduce the required density distribution of dark matter from the observed motion of visible matter? Here "visible matter" is something that interacts electromagnetically and not only gravitationally.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter_halo
 
hilbert2 said:
The question is, can such an observer calculate how many dark matter point masses there must be in the observed system to make the system self-consistent, and what are their masses and trajectories? In what cases a unique solution exists to this problem?

This technique has been used to show the existence of astronomical bodies that aren't directly visible - for example, we infer the existence of a dark companion when we observe a bright star making otherwise unexplained motions. It's harder in a more complex many-body problem, of course, but in principle it's still possible.

The solutions need not be unique in any practical sense, because two bodies of mass M close enough to one another and distant enough from the other objects will be observationally indistinguishable from one body of mass 2M and located at their center of mass.
 
hilbert2 said:
I probably didn't express this clearly enough... (English isn't my native language) I have seen that the observed rotational motion of galaxies is explained with a hypothesis that there is a "halo" of dark matter around all galaxies. How does one deduce the required density distribution of dark matter from the observed motion of visible matter? Here "visible matter" is something that interacts electromagnetically and not only gravitationally.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter_halo

That question is much easier to answer (The previous question is very interesting but not trivial at all).

It is very easy. Find out the force required to keep a star in circular motion around the center of the galaxy using F = mv2/r.

Compare that with the force produced by the gravitational force due to the visible mass.

Assume the difference between the two numbers is due to a spherically symmetric distribution of dark matter.

Compare that with the gravitational force produced by such a spherical mass distribution in order to figure its mass.

Voila!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
180
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top