Calculating Critical Angle: Relative vs. Absolute Refractive Index

AI Thread Summary
Absolute refractive index is essential for calculating the critical angle, particularly when dealing with two mediums. To find the critical angle, use Snell's law, which states that n1 sin(θ1) = n2 sin(θ2), assuming n1 is greater than n2 and θ2 equals 90 degrees. This leads to the conclusion that total internal reflection occurs only when light travels from a denser medium (n1) to a less dense medium (n2). Confusion arises when calculating the relative refractive index, as it can result in a sine inverse greater than one, indicating that total internal reflection conditions are not met. Understanding the relationship between the refractive indices is crucial for correctly determining the critical angle.
Samurai44
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
Do we use Absloute refractive index when finding crtical angle ?

if it was two mediums ( not vacuum or air) how would i calculate the critical angle ? I mean i get confused when I find relative refractive index because sometimes i get sine inverse greater than 1 which give no solution .

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Snell's law reads as ##n_1 \sin{\theta_1} = n_2 \sin{\theta_2} ##. Now if we assume ##n_1## to be greater than ##n_2## and ##\theta_2 = 90^0##, what will you end up with?
What can you then conclude for the requirement for ##n_1## and ##n_2## so that total internal reflection which is associated with critical angle can take place?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Snell's law reads as ##n_1 \sin{\theta_1} = n_2 \sin{\theta_2} ##. Now if we assume ##n_1## to be greater than ##n_2## and ##\theta_2 = 90^0##, what will you end up with?
What can you then conclude for the requirement for ##n_1## and ##n_2## so that total internal reflection which is associated with critical angle can take place?

it will end up with ##n_1 \sin{\theta_1} = n_2 ? , n1 is denser than n2 since its greater than
I know the fact that critical angle occurs only from denser medium to less dense , and that's why I get confused when I find relative refractive index
 
Samurai44 said:
I know the fact that critical angle occurs only from denser medium to less dense ,
If you had known this, then why would you get sine inverse greater than one when calculating a critical angle?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top