Calculating degeneracy of the energy levels of a 2D harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the degeneracy of energy levels in a 2D harmonic oscillator, specifically addressing the relationship between quantum numbers \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) and their contributions to degeneracy. The participants confirm that for \(n=4\), the degeneracy is 2, derived from the combinations of \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) values. The energy eigenvalues are correctly expressed as \(E_{n_1,n_2}=\hbar \omega (n_1+n_2+1)\) and variations for non-isotropic systems are discussed, emphasizing the importance of commensurable frequencies for degeneracy to occur.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with quantum numbers and their role in energy level calculations.
  • Knowledge of degeneracy concepts in quantum systems.
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating equations and inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of energy eigenvalues for 2D harmonic oscillators.
  • Explore the concept of accidental degeneracies in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the implications of commensurable frequencies in oscillatory systems.
  • Learn about the mathematical techniques for visualizing quantum states, such as ladder diagrams.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists studying harmonic oscillators, and anyone interested in the mathematical aspects of energy level degeneracy in quantum systems.

sukmeov
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I calculated the energies for decoupled oscillators to be E_n_1 = 3 ħω(n_1+1/2) and E_n_2 = ħω(n_2 +1/2) and so the total energy of the 2D harmonic oscillator is E = ħω(3n_1+n_2 +2). What's the degeneracy for each energy level?
Relevant Equations
none... just counting
Too dim for this kind of combinatorics. Could anyone refer me to/ explain a general way of approaching these without having to think :D. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait... If n=3n_1 + n_2 then is it just floor(n/3) +1?
 
Make some kind of graph or ladder diagram. Then just look. This one seems hardly worth the effort...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sukmeov
Yeah. Think I was being silly. A general method might be useful for 3 or more summands... I posted an attempt above. Do you think it is correct?
 
I don't think so. If n=4 specify the 2 degenerate states by ##(n_1,n_2)##.
Make a little matrix table of degeneracy with ##(n_1,n_2)##, you'll see
 
4= 3x0+4= 3x1 +1, so degeneracy is 2. floor(4/3)+1=2... am I missing something?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
You know I made a little table. You are in fact correct! Apologies for the brain fade.
 
Shouldn't the energy eigenvalues be
$$E_{n_1,n_2}=\hbar \omega (n_1+n_2+1)$$
with ##n_1,n_2 \in \mathbb{N}_0##?
 
vanhees71 said:
Shouldn't the energy eigenvalues be
En1,n2=ℏω(n1+n2+1)
I don't think the problem is isotropic. But I don't know of any system where this is a good model (other than pedagogy).
 
  • #10
Well, but then you have
$$E_{n_1,n_2}=\hbar (\omega_1 n_1 + \omega_2 n_2 +1)$$
with different frequencies for the normal modes of the plane oscillator. I'm still puzzled about where the formula for the energy eigenvalues in #1 comes from.
 
  • #11
I assumed they just defined ##\omega _1= 3\omega_2##

Clearly it is artificial. As I consider it, are there subtleties to such "accidental" degeneracies? Everything has a finite energy width in practice.
 
  • #12
Oscillator with diagonal potential (1 0
0 9).
 
  • #13
Argh. My fault. Of course, if you want to have degeneracy at all ##\omega_1## and ##\omega_2## must be "commensurable", i.e., ##\omega_1/\omega_2 \in \mathbb{Q}##. Now it makes sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K