Calculating degeneracy of the energy levels of a 2D harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the degeneracy of energy levels in a two-dimensional harmonic oscillator, focusing on combinatorial approaches and the implications of different energy eigenvalue formulations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for determining degeneracy, including combinatorial reasoning and graphical representations. Questions arise about the correctness of specific formulations and assumptions regarding energy eigenvalues and degeneracies.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the relationship between quantum states and their degeneracies, with some participants questioning the assumptions made about the system's isotropy and the definitions of frequencies. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in reasoning and a willingness to explore different interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of commensurability between frequencies for degeneracy to occur, and there is mention of the artificial nature of certain assumptions regarding energy levels.

sukmeov
Messages
10
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I calculated the energies for decoupled oscillators to be E_n_1 = 3 ħω(n_1+1/2) and E_n_2 = ħω(n_2 +1/2) and so the total energy of the 2D harmonic oscillator is E = ħω(3n_1+n_2 +2). What's the degeneracy for each energy level?
Relevant Equations
none... just counting
Too dim for this kind of combinatorics. Could anyone refer me to/ explain a general way of approaching these without having to think :D. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait... If n=3n_1 + n_2 then is it just floor(n/3) +1?
 
Make some kind of graph or ladder diagram. Then just look. This one seems hardly worth the effort...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sukmeov
Yeah. Think I was being silly. A general method might be useful for 3 or more summands... I posted an attempt above. Do you think it is correct?
 
I don't think so. If n=4 specify the 2 degenerate states by ##(n_1,n_2)##.
Make a little matrix table of degeneracy with ##(n_1,n_2)##, you'll see
 
4= 3x0+4= 3x1 +1, so degeneracy is 2. floor(4/3)+1=2... am I missing something?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
You know I made a little table. You are in fact correct! Apologies for the brain fade.
 
Shouldn't the energy eigenvalues be
$$E_{n_1,n_2}=\hbar \omega (n_1+n_2+1)$$
with ##n_1,n_2 \in \mathbb{N}_0##?
 
vanhees71 said:
Shouldn't the energy eigenvalues be
En1,n2=ℏω(n1+n2+1)
I don't think the problem is isotropic. But I don't know of any system where this is a good model (other than pedagogy).
 
  • #10
Well, but then you have
$$E_{n_1,n_2}=\hbar (\omega_1 n_1 + \omega_2 n_2 +1)$$
with different frequencies for the normal modes of the plane oscillator. I'm still puzzled about where the formula for the energy eigenvalues in #1 comes from.
 
  • #11
I assumed they just defined ##\omega _1= 3\omega_2##

Clearly it is artificial. As I consider it, are there subtleties to such "accidental" degeneracies? Everything has a finite energy width in practice.
 
  • #12
Oscillator with diagonal potential (1 0
0 9).
 
  • #13
Argh. My fault. Of course, if you want to have degeneracy at all ##\omega_1## and ##\omega_2## must be "commensurable", i.e., ##\omega_1/\omega_2 \in \mathbb{Q}##. Now it makes sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K