Calculating Depth of Water in Hemispherical Bowl with Related Rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter ƒ(x)
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the rate of change of water depth in a hemispherical bowl as water is added at a constant rate. The bowl has a radius of 8 cm, and the inquiry focuses on the rate of increase in depth when the water depth reaches 4 cm.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between volume and depth, with some attempting to apply the formula for the volume of a sphere. Others explore alternative methods, such as considering the volume of circular prisms and using differential calculus to relate volume change to height change.

Discussion Status

There are various attempts to derive the rate of change of depth, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their calculations. Several methods are being explored, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or answer.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of applying the volume formula for a sphere to this problem, indicating a need to consider the specific geometry of the hemispherical bowl. There is also mention of the constraints imposed by the problem's parameters and the rate at which water is added.

ƒ(x)
Messages
327
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Water is dripping into a hemispherical bowl with a radius of 8 cm at a rate of 1 cubic cm per minute. At what rate is the depth increasing when it is 4 cm.

A) 1/96π
B) 1/48π
C) 1/24π
D) 1/16π
E) 1/8π

Homework Equations



V = (4πr3)/3
and any other relevant equations, but that's the only one I know of that will help.

The Attempt at a Solution



V = (4πr3)/3
and...that's about it. B is the correct answer btw.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dV/dt = 4πr2(dr/dt)
-1/(4π) = r2(dr/dt)

when h = 4, then r = 4

-1/(4π) = 16(dr/dt)
-1/(64π) = dr/dt

But...that can't be correct.

Since dr/dt is decreasing, dh/dt has to be increasing.
 
Last edited:
Anyone?
 
hmmm... haven't checked your working, but as a short cut without driving the full volume of the filled region with depth, for the given depth, work out the radius of the cirlce at the top at relate the total volume change to the volume change of a circluar prism, hieght dz...
 
ƒ(x) said:
dV/dt = 4πr2(dr/dt)
-1/(4π) = r2(dr/dt)

when h = 4, then r = 4

-1/(4π) = 16(dr/dt)
-1/(64π) = dr/dt

But...that can't be correct.

Since dr/dt is decreasing, dh/dt has to be increasing.

so what i think you did here is differentiate the volume of a sphere, which doens;t work for this problem,

it only applies if you are expanding shperically, (ie effectively addind or removing spherical shells of volume
 
Ok, I tried a different approach to this, but still didnt get the right answer.

pmvj8.jpg
 
Sorry for the large image.
 
Oh...

Ok...

So if I look at it as being composed of tiny slices, each of Δh height and of ΔV volume I get:

ΔV = (π)(r2)Δh

1 = π(16h-h2)Δh
1 = 48πΔh
1/48π = Δh

But, why doesn't the other method (the one in the image) work?
 
I guess its because V doesn't equal (2π/3)(r2)h

V = ∫ πr2 dh and then the derivative of that is just dV/dt = πr2(dh/dt)

Any ideas?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K