Calculating Dose for 3 Hours of 0.3 mSv Beta Radiation Exposure

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ukitake Jyuushirou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Count Radiation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating radiation dose exposure from beta radiation, specifically addressing a textbook question about 3 hours of exposure to 0.3 millisieverts. It clarifies that the sievert is a unit of dose equivalence, defined as joules per kilogram, and emphasizes the importance of the radiation type in determining the dose received, with beta radiation having a weight factor of 1. The conversation also touches on cosmic radiation, confirming it is primarily beta radiation, which simplifies the calculation of dose exposure. Understanding the weight factor is crucial for accurately assessing the health impact of different radiation types. Overall, the key takeaway is that the type of radiation significantly influences the dose calculation.
Ukitake Jyuushirou
Messages
124
Reaction score
0
For the SI measurement sieverts, are they in per seconds ? Off the internet I can find only sieverts measure as "joules per kg"

But one of the question in my textbook ask me how much dosage a person is exposed to 3 hrs of 0.3 millisieverts
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ukitake Jyuushirou said:
For the SI measurement sieverts, are they in per seconds ? Off the internet I can find only sieverts measure as "joules per kg"

But one of the question in my textbook ask me how much dosage a person is exposed to 3 hrs of 0.3 millisieverts

The dose equivalence H is related with the dose:

H = W * D

with W = weightfactor and D = dose in J/kg. The sievert has thus the same unit as the dose: Jkg^{-1} = 1 Sv (when the impact of the radiation is meant)

To answer your question: it depends on the type of radiotion how much dose a person has received, since the weightfactor for alfa-radiation = 20 (high ionisation damage) whereas beta/gamma/rontgen-radiation have a weightfactor of only 1. So this question misses some crucial information !

--> the Sievert is a unit which is comparable when looking at the effect of the radiation. Damage by 1 Sv alfa-radiation equals 1 Sv gamma-radiation, but 1 Gy alfa-radiation does not equal 1 Gy gamma-radiation.
 
Last edited:
sdekivit said:
The dose equivalence H is related with the dose:

H = W * D

with W = weightfactor and D = dose in J/kg. The sievert has thus the same unit as the dose: Jkg^{-1} = 1 Sv (when the impact of the radiation is meant)

To answer your question: it depends on the type of radiotion how much dose a person has received, since the weightfactor for alfa-radiation = 20 (high ionisation damage) whereas beta/gamma/rontgen-radiation have a weightfactor of only 1. So this question misses some crucial information !

--> the Sievert is a unit which is comparable when looking at the effect of the radiation. Damage by 1 Sv alfa-radiation equals 1 Sv gamma-radiation, but 1 Gy alfa-radiation does not equal 1 Gy gamma-radiation.

the question in its entirety:

The average radiation dose due to background radiation in Australia at ground level is 1.5 ms (milisievert) per year. Of this amount 0.3 ms is from cosmic radiation. The radiation dose due to cosmic source of a trip by plane from Sydney to Melbourne is 0.01 ms. If the trip takes 3 hrs , what radiation dose due to cosmic source does a person on the ground recieves?

:redface:
 
Ukitake Jyuushirou said:
the question in its entirety:

The average radiation dose due to background radiation in Australia at ground level is 1.5 ms (milisievert) per year. Of this amount 0.3 ms is from cosmic radiation. The radiation dose due to cosmic source of a trip by plane from Sydney to Melbourne is 0.01 ms. If the trip takes 3 hrs , what radiation dose due to cosmic source does a person on the ground recieves?

:redface:

do you think cosmic radiation can be alfa-radiation ? or beta-radiation ? or gamma-radiation? (Think about the properties and particles of these types of radiation)

This is the crucial info i meant and from this question you can determine the weightfactor for this radiation ;)
 
sdekivit said:
do you think cosmic radiation can be alfa-radiation ? or beta-radiation ? or gamma-radiation? (Think about the properties and particles of these types of radiation)

This is the crucial info i meant and from this question you can determine the weightfactor for this radiation ;)
beta radiation...cant be alfa...sweet...i'd go work on it... :smile:
 
Ukitake Jyuushirou said:
beta radiation...cant be alfa...sweet...i'd go work on it... :smile:

do you think the particles are electrons ? The maximum travellength of these particles is about 6 m ;)

But it doesn't matter: W = 1 for this radiation and so the dose can be calculated for this radiation type :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top