Calculating Drag: Measuring Time with Light Gates

  • Thread starter Thread starter tom jenkins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drag
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the drag on a toy car descending a slope, the experiment involved measuring time at various distances using light gates. The actual and theoretical velocities were derived using vector components and SUVAT equations, factoring in gravitational forces acting on the car. The parallel force driving the car down the slope was calculated, while acknowledging that friction and air resistance would reduce the actual velocity. The friction force was determined by the coefficient of friction multiplied by the perpendicular force acting on the car. Ultimately, the net retardant force, which includes both air resistance and friction, must be assessed to accurately compute the drag.
tom jenkins
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i couducted an experiment trying to calculate the drag of a toy car going down a slope, i measured this at different distances 2.0m to 0.5m at 0.1m intervals along a 15° slope. i measured the time using light gates. i put one light gate at the end of the slope and one where the car started from e.g. 2.0m or 0.5m

how do i work out the drag?

results for 2m are 1.24s
i tried working out the actual average velocity and then the theoretical average velocity

i tried working out the actual veloity by using vectors and suvat
2cos15 = 1.93
2sin15 = 0.52
i worked out the vertical acceleration and also the horizontal acceleration

how do i work out the actual velocity and the theoretical velocity down the slope?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a force pulling the car vertically downwards due to the gravitational attraction of earth.

This force can be split up into two components, a component pulling the car into the slope (perpendicularly to the slope), and a force pulling the car down the slope (parallel to the slope)

The total vertical force = mass of the car * 9.81 = F

cos15=F/parallel force
sin15=F/perpendicular force

so from this you can work out the components.

The maximum theoretical velocity assuming no friction or air resistance can be worked out using the force pulling the car parallel to the slope.

parallel acceleration = parallel F / M

then use SUVAT equations to find the velocity.

However the actual force pulling the car down parallel to the slope will be slightly less, because there will be a force in the opposite direction due to friction and air resistance.

so parallel acceleration = (parallel F - (air resistance force + friction force) )/ M

the friction force will equal a constant of friction between the tires and the slope multiplied by the perpendicular force pulling the car into the slope.

F(friction) = u * perpendicular force

it will be difficult to find u, as you now have two unknowns, the friction constant, and the force due to air ressistance, however you can work out what the net retardant force equals

net retardant force = (air resistance force + friction force)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top