Calculating Earth Masses in a Planet with Earth-Size and Moon-Density

  • Thread starter Thread starter brianh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Planet
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the mass of a planet that is the same size as Earth but has the density of the Moon, one can start by recognizing that the volume of the planet is equivalent to one Earth volume. The key is to compare the densities of Earth and the Moon, as density is defined as mass per unit volume. By using the known density values for both Earth and the Moon, one can derive the mass of the planet in Earth masses. This approach simplifies the problem significantly, making it easier to arrive at the solution. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurate calculations in planetary science.
brianh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
"Earth Masses"

I've been stuck on a problem for a few days now, and I know that it is a lot easier than I am making it out to be. My goal is to find how many Earth masses lie within a planet who has the same size as Earth, and the same density as the moon.

I honestly do not know how to go about this problem. Could anybody give me any guiding tips?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


density is mass per unit volume

an object the same size as Earth has the same volume as earth

define your unit volume as one Earth volume
 


compare densities of Earth and moon ... that's almost all in a way! :biggrin:
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top