Calculating Effective Spring Constant for Platform Supported on 4 Springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter huskydc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Platform Springs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The effective spring constant for a platform supported by four springs, with a mass of 0.8 kg and an additional mass of 0.6 kg from modeling clay, is calculated to be 98.1 N/m. The platform compresses 6 cm (0.06 m) due to the weight of the clay, which is the only force contributing to the static equilibrium position. The oscillation amplitude immediately after the clay impacts the platform requires the application of conservation of momentum and energy principles, specifically equating initial kinetic energy to the potential energy at maximum compression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Knowledge of conservation of momentum and energy principles
  • Familiarity with oscillatory motion and amplitude calculations
  • Basic physics concepts related to forces and mass
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Hooke's Law in static and dynamic systems
  • Learn about conservation of momentum in inelastic collisions
  • Explore energy transformations in oscillatory systems, particularly potential and kinetic energy
  • Investigate the effects of damping on oscillations in spring-mass systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in dynamics and oscillatory motion analysis will benefit from this discussion.

huskydc
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
A platform of mass 0.8 kg is supported on four springs (only two springs are shown in the picture, but there are four altogether). A chunk of modeling clay of mass 0.6 kg is held above the table and dropped so that it hits the table with a speed of v = 0.9 m/s.

The clay sticks to the table so that the the table and clay oscillate up and down together. Finally, the table comes to rest 6 cm below its original position.

-->What is the effective spring constant of all four springs taken together?

i did the following: F = kx

so F/x = k

i'm thinking the only force contributing to this is dropping (force) of the modeling clay on the platform. or does the weight (gravity) of the platform contribute to any of this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Presumably, the mass of the platform is considered in the initial position of the springs.

The additional mass of the clay displaces the springs further.

At rest, this becomes a static problem.

If one is considering the oscillation, then one would have to consider the combined mass.
 
If the table has come to rest, then the velocity with which the clay struck the table and any resulting oscillations are irrlevant.
What you did is pefectly correct. Also, the weight of the platform doesn't get involved since we are told it stopped (6 cm) below its original position - so it's only the 6 cm compression that has to be considered and all of that is provided by the (static force) of the weight of the clay on the platform/spring combination.
 
The only thing that is relevant here is that you are told the mass of the clay and that the table comes to rest 6 cm. below its original height. In other words, compressing the spring 6 cm= 0.06 m will support a force of 0.8g = 0.8(9.81) Newtons.

The fact that clay was originally dropped from a height affects the oscillation but not the final equilibrium position. The mass (and weight) of the table itself determines the original height of the table. It is the added weight of the clay that causes the 6 cm compression.
 
ok, the figured out the k = 98.1 N/m,

next the problem asks:

With what amplitude does the platform oscillate immediately after the clay hits the platform?

i first used the momentum conservation, and found the velocity of the clay+platform system is equal to .36

since total E = .5kA^2

i'm not sure here, but i set initial E = final E like the following:

initial KE + initial PE = final KE + final PE
.5mv^2 + 0 = .5(m of clay + M of platform).36^2 + .5kx^2

then the final KE equal to .5kA^2, it got me the incorrect answer, but is there anything wrong with this though?
 
At maximum compression (the amplitude of the oscillation), the speed of the clay and table is 0, not ".36" (that's the speed of clay and table immediately after impact which is not relevant).
 
well, the book has pretty much the same example, it says to find the final speed of the clay and platform system, find kinetic energy of the system after collision then set this KE to .5kA^2, tried that example myself, it didnt work out ...
 
But you didn't do that, did you? You had ".5mv^2 + 0 = .5(m of clay + M of platform).36^2 + .5kx^2" That ".4kx^2" is the ".5k A^2" but you haven't set that equal to the kinetic energy after collision. The kinetic energy of the clay, platform combination immediately after collision should be exactly the same as the kinetic energy of the clay alone just before collision- that's what I was using.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K