Calculating Electric Dipole Moment of Point Charges Along Z-Axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric dipole moment of a specific charge distribution along the z-axis. The user presents their formulation using delta functions to represent point charges and seeks clarification on the notation and evaluation of integrals. They question whether to use prime notation for delta function arguments and how to handle the integration of vector quantities in three-dimensional space. Responses clarify that all integration variables should be denoted with primes and that the function for integration can simply be the vector itself. The user expresses gratitude for the guidance received.
joschua
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi

I want to calculate the electric dipole moment of point charges along the z-axis with distances a and with the charge distribution

\varrho (\vec{x}) = q \delta (\vec{x}) - 2q \delta (\vec{x} - \vec{a}) + q \delta (\vec{x} - 2 \vec{a})

and of course \vec{a} = a \vec{e}_{z}

I did the following:

\vec{p} = \int \vec{x}' \varrho (\vec{x'}) d^{3}x'

= q \int \vec{x}' \delta (\vec{x}) d^{3}x' - 2q \int \vec{x}' \delta (\vec{x} - \vec{a}) d^{3}x' + q \int \vec{x}' \delta (\vec{x} - 2 \vec{a}) d^{3}x'

Now I have some questions:

1.) I guess I should write a prime in the arguments of the delta functions. Is this true? (The definition of my electric dipole moment is with prime, the given distribution without but that makes no sense? I should write a prime to all x vectors or no primes. correct?

2.) How to evaluate the integrals further? I know that the delta function is only one at the points of the charges and everywhere else zero but what to do with the x-vectors?

If this would be a normal integral I would do integration by parts, but this makes no sense here.

In general I know the relation that

\int f(x) \delta (x-a) dx = f(a)

but here I have no Function f because x is a vector and I am in 3-d space.

I am confused. Please help me.

edit:

I wanted to post it in Classical Physics and not here. Wrong forum. Sorry... maybe a nice mentor will move it? :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. All integration variables are x', including in the delta.
2. The f(x) here is just f(x)=x. You are integrating only along the x axis.
 
thanks, I got it
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top