Calculating Electric Potential of Ammonia Molecule: Can You Help?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential generated by an ammonia molecule, which has a dipole moment of 1.47 D, at a distance of 52.0 nm from its center. The formula provided for the electric potential on the dipole axis is V = (1/(4 π ε)) * (2p/r²), where p is the dipole moment. The potential needs to be determined for an ion with a charge of 1.6 x 10^-19 C brought to this point. Participants are encouraged to provide explanations and assistance in solving the problem. The request emphasizes the need for clarity in the calculations involved.
leopold123
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Could anyone help me with the following problem?
Ammonia molecule has a dipole moment of 1.47D. Calculate the potential generated by this molecule at a point on a dipole axis at a distance of 52.0 nm from the centre of the dipole. how large will the potential be if an ion of charge q=1e=1.6*10^-19 C is brought at this point? it would be really helpful if you provide any required useful explanation...thank you...waiitng eagerly for ur response...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please help me...i ll be really grateful if any1 helps me with this...
 
The electric potential at a distance 'r' on the axis of a short dipole is given by

V = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon} \frac{2 p}{r^2} where p is the dipole moment which according to the problem is given to be 1.47 D.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top