Calculating Elementary Charge Using Millikan's Experiment Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter decamij
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
Click For Summary
To calculate the elementary charge using Millikan's experiment results, apply the equation q = mgr/V with the provided mass, voltage, and distance values. The calculated charges for the oil drops are 1.12 x 10^-18 C, 8.0 x 10^-19 C, 3.2 x 10^-19 C, and 9.6 x 10^-19 C. Since the elementary charge is an indivisible unit, the charge on each drop must be an integer multiple of this value. To determine the elementary charge, find the greatest common divisor of the calculated charges. This method allows for a straightforward identification of the elementary charge from the experimental data.
decamij
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Using BASIC physics, and being given some results of Millikan's experiment, how would i calculate elementary charge. Basic physics means using the following equation:


q = mgr
V

Here are some results:

mass (kg) voltage (V) distance (m)
3.2X10^-15 140.0 0.005
2.4X10^-15 147.0 0.005
1.9X10^-15 290.9 0.005
4.2X10^-15 214.4 0.005

i used the above equation to find the charge on each oil drop. Then what do i do?
P.S. I'm only in grade 12, and i only the basics of this topic. Please don't use crazy 4th year advanced physics.

Thanx a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you calculate the charge on the drop for each experiment, you get:
##1.12\times 10^{-18} C##
##8.0\times 10^{-19} C##
##3.2\times 10^{-19} C##
##9.6\times 10^{-19} C##
Assuming that the elementary charge is an indivisible unit tells you that the charge on an oil drop must be an integer multiple of the elementary charge (so you can have, e.g., 3, 8, or 17 charges on an oil droplet, but you can't have a fraction of a charge). With this knowledge, finding the elementary charge is as straightforward as finding the greatest common divisor of the charges on individual oil drops.
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K