Calculating Energy Stored in a Metallic Object in a Magnetic Field

[rsr_life]

Hi!

I'd like to know if there is some way of computing or deriving the energy stored in a metallic object subject to a magnetic field from external sources?

Say, an iron cylinder or a sphere in a magnetic field (that is uniform or non-uniform). What is the energy in the cylinder because of this external magnetic field? Is there some formula that I can use or some concept or site that I can look at to understand this? Been stuck with this for a while and my results don't look right.

Appreciate any help in advance.

 

[rsr_life]

Btw, I'd appreciate a strong mathematical description (link, theory, idea), etc. Am a grad student, so the math itself isn't the problem. Just the concept, taking into account interface conditions, etc. I assume that's how it's done in PF? Suggestions are always welcome.

 

[pam]

The energy depends on the geometry of the object, among other things.
A soft iron sphere in an originally uniform magnetic field B_0 is probably the easiest case.
The magnetization in the sphere is uniform, given by M=3B_0/4pi (in Gaussian units).
This is found in the same way as for a dielectric sphere in a uniform electric field.
The magnetic energy is given by U=(1/8\pi)\int B^2d^r,
for which I get U=B_0^2R^3/4pi.

 

[rsr_life]

Thanks for that Pam,

But what is the basic relation that I derive this from? I'd like to do it for a cylinder and for some other shapes too. Wouldn't the field depend on the angle that each small area makes with the external field?

And is that integrand B^2*d^r? What's that notation?

 

[pam]

I was a bit careless, The integral should be
U=(1/8\pi)\int {\vec B}\cdot{\vec H}d^3r.
However, since H~0 inside a high mu sphere, the integral is for all space outside the sphere where B=H, so the B^2 is correct here.
The problem for a soft iron sphere is just the same as for a dielectric sphere in an electric field, which is done in most EM books. Then, the B field for r>R is just that of a dipole.
The energy is very shape dependent. For a long narrow cylinder aligned with the B_0 field, or for a disk, the calculation is also fairly simple.
The procedure is:
Use the standard electrostatic methods, just letting E-->H, D-->B, P-->M, epsilon-->mu
to find B, H, and M. Then do the integral over B.H.
For more complicated, shapes, the first step becomes very complicated.

 

[rsr_life]

Thanks for that, Pam.

Turns out that the general solution to the problem is mentioned clearly in Stratton.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0470131535/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You can find cheaper versions of the book online or even in your university library.