Calculating Equations of Satellite Motion for Scientists

AI Thread Summary
Calculating equations of satellite motion involves understanding the principles of orbital mechanics, including gravitational forces and velocity. Participants suggest using online resources for foundational knowledge and references. Clarifications on the original question indicate some confusion among contributors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of thorough research before seeking specific guidance. Engaging with existing literature can enhance understanding of satellite motion calculations.
bryan goh
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
how to calculate equations of satellite motion because I just thought to make it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bryan goh said:
how to calculate equations of satellite motion because I just thought to make it
Google is your friend! :smile:
 
To make a satellite?
 
DrSteve said:
To make a satellite?

that wasn't your original Q,

As berkeman suggested, google your Q then come back with references to anything you didn't understand
and see if some one can guide your through :smile:
 
davenn said:
that wasn't your original Q,

I think you have your OP confused...
 
glappkaeft said:
I think you have your OP confused...
No big deal. That never happens to me, though... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Satellite mechanics: linear and rotational momentum
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Newton's Second Law - variable mass case
Replies
14
Views
2K
Orbital Slingshot and Conservation of Momentum Confusion
Replies
9
Views
7K
Orbital Mechanics Vis Viva Equation Question
Replies
1
Views
2K
Conservative forces, Nonconservative forces and Potential Energy
Replies
9
Views
3K
Why is the speed of orbiting satellites constant?
Replies
16
Views
4K
Atmospheric drag on an artificial satellite orbiting the Earth
Replies
4
Views
2K
Orbital Mechanics: Find Eqns of Motion w/ Initial Conditions
Replies
3
Views
1K
How do GPS Satellites work exactly?
Replies
5
Views
2K
How to get tangential velocity
Replies
28
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top