Calculating Expected Value of Oil Co. Offshore Drilling Bid

  • Thread starter Thread starter cronxeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
cronxeh
Gold Member
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
11
An oil company submits a bid of $1 million on an offshore area that the government is releasing for drilling. The company will win the bid and be awarded exclusive rights to the area with probability of 0.4. If awarded the bid, the company will drill and will find oil worth $6 million with the probability 1/3, otherwise the hole will be dry and yield nothing. The company's drilling costs are $1 million. Find the expected value of the deal to the company


OK I figure P(Winning the bid)=0.4 P(Losing the bid)=0.6 P(Striking Oil)=1/3 P(No Oil)=2/3 From decision tree I constructed, I figure

P(Making Profit of $6mil - $1mil for drilling - $1mil for bid = $4mil profit)=(0.4)*1/3=4/30 ~= 13.33%

P(Loss of $1mil for bid + $1mil for drilling = $2 million)=(0.4)*2/3 = 8/30 ~= 26.67%

P(Losing the bid, but no loss of money)=0.6 = 60%

Now my question is.. is this correct? the book has answer as '0' for some reason

I've summed up total probabilities (13.33+26.67+60=100) so I think I got it right, where am I getting it wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cronxeh said:
Now my question is.. is this correct? the book has answer as '0' for some reason

You didn't give the answer in your post! You gave the probabilities, but not the expected value.
 
OK I think I got it

(-$2mil)*(8/30) + (+$4mil)*(4/30) = -16/30 mil + 16/30 mil = 0
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top