Calculating Final Velocity in a System with Potential Energy and Friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final velocity of a 5.00 kg ball after it falls 1.20 m in a system affected by friction. The coefficient of friction is 0.200, and the block's mass is 3.00 kg. Initial calculations led to an incorrect final velocity, prompting a reevaluation of the mass used in the kinetic energy equation. The correct approach involves using the total mass of the system, resulting in a final velocity of 3.59 m/s. The importance of accurately accounting for all forces and masses in the equations is emphasized.
closer
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The coefficient of friction (uk) between the 3.00 kg block (m1) and the surface in Figure P7.21 is 0.200. The system starts from rest. What is the speed of the 5.00 kg ball (m2) when it has fallen 1.20 m (y)?

p7-21.gif


Wnet = \DeltaKE
Um2 - Wfk = .5m2vf2 - .5m2vi2
(m2g)(y) - (uk)(N)(x) = 5m2vf2 - .5m2vi2
(m2g)(y) - (uk)(m1g)(x) = .5m2vf2 - .5m2vi2

m1 = 3
m2 = 5
uk = .2
y = 1.2
vi = 0
vf = ?
x = ?

I'm trying to find vf. I don't know what x would be for the work done by friction. I'm sure I made some other mistakes as well. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can use those formulas- why haven't you?

After the ball has fallen 1.5 m, its potential energy has decreased by its mass times g times the distance: that's the mgy in your second equation. Here m= 5.00, g= 9.81, and y= 1.5. Some of that energy went into friction (and warms the desk): that's the ukNx in your formula. You are told that uk= 0.200, N is the weight of the block, (3.00)(9.81, and x is the distance the block moved, also 1.5 since the rope connecting the block and ball doesn't change length. On the right of your second equation you have the total kinetic energy of the system. But you do not have vi and vf: both block and ball have 0 speed initially and the same speed finally. It should be (.4)(3.00+ 5.00)v2 and it is v you want to solve for.
 
(m2g)(y) - (uk)(m1g)(x) = .5m2vf2 - .5m2vi2

(5)(9.8)(1.2) - (.2)(3)(9.8)(1.2) = (.5)(5)(vf2) - 0
vf = 4.54

Final answer is incorrect. Any ideas?

Edit: Got it. As you just mentioned, I should have used mass of the system instead of just m2 on the right side.

vf = 3.59

Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top