Calculating flux using surface integrals.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral involving a vector field defined as f(x, y, z) = x²i + xyj + zk over a specified portion of a plane. The participants are exploring the calculation of flux through this surface using surface integrals and the divergence theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the parametrization of the surface and the calculation of the normal vector. There are attempts to evaluate the integral and check for calculation errors. Some participants question the correctness of the setup and the application of the divergence theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and corrections to each other's calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of the problem and the implications of the divergence theorem. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding whether the surface is closed and how that affects the application of the divergence theorem. Participants are also addressing potential errors in the integration process and the implications of the specified normal direction.

thepatient
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
This isn't homework. I've been restudying vector calculus from the beginning to end on my free time and got stuck on this problem. I am not sure what I'm doing wrong, but it may be a calculation error since it has so much calculation involved.

Homework Statement


Evaluate the surface integral \int\int_{\Sigma}f*d\sigma, where f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk and is the
part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit
normal n pointing in the positive z direction.

Homework Equations


\int\int_{\Sigma}f*d\sigma = \int\int_{R}f*n*d\sigma, where
d\sigma = |dr/du X dr/dv|dudv, and r is a vector parametricized for the surface.

n = outward unit normal vector from the surface.

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I parametricized the surface as a vector in terms of u and v:
x = u
y = v
z = 2 -3x - 1.5y
\overline{r}(u,v) = <u, v, 2-3u - 1.5v>
R is the region on the u, v plane under the line v = 2 -2u, u≥0, v≥0
Took partial derivatives in terms of u and v:
d\overline{r}/du = <1, 0, -3>
d\overline{r}/dv = <0,1,-1.5>

Calculated |dr/du X dr/dv|:
i j k
1 0 -3
0 1 -1.5 =
|3i + 1.5j + k| = (9 + 2.25 + 1)^1/2 = 3.5

Calculated n:
Since the plane is 6x + 3y + 2z = 6, perpendicular to the plane would be the vector v = <6, 3, 2>, so n would be v/(|v|), the vector divided by its magnitude.
n = <6, 3, 2>/|7| = <6/7, 3/7, 2/7>

Calculating f(u,v) * n:
f(u,v) = <(u^2), (uv), (2 -3u - 1.5v)>* <6/7, 3/7, 2/7> =
1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v)

Plugging into equation:
\int\int_{R}f*n*d\sigma R=[(u,v): 0<u<1, 0<v<2-2u]

\int\int_{R} 1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v) *(3.5) *dvdu =

1/2 \int\int_{R}6u^2 + 3uv -6u - 3v + 4 dv du =
1/2 \int6u^2v + 3uv^2 -3v^2/2 + 4v (evaluating v from 0 to 2-2u) dv

Using wolfram alpha to evaluate (got tired of doing it by hand like 6 times XD) :
1/2 \int24u^3 + 30u^2 + 8u + 2 du from u = 0..1
1/2 * (24u^4/4 + 30u^3/3 + 8u^2/2 + 2u) from 0 to 1
1/2 (6 + 10+4+2) = 11

The answer should be 15/4 though. I'm not sure what I did wrong, maybe I missed something. Can anyone see what I did wrong in this problem? Thanks much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it's just a typo, but you dropped the term -6u from the integrand on the step where you simplified 3.5/7 to 1/2 and reordered the terms.

EDIT: I get 7/4 as well.
 
Last edited:
Oops. I redid it and got 13/2 with the -6u term. It came out to 13/2 though. :(
 
If I remember correctly, since the surface Σ is closed, the divergence theorem applies right?

∫∫Rf*n*dσ = ∫∫∫div(f) dV

x is from 0 to one
y is from 0 to the line -2x + 2
z is from 0 to the plane 3 - 3x -3y/2

f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk
div(f) = d/dx i + d/dy j + d/dz k * x^2i + xyj + zk
= 2x + x + 1 = 3x+1

∫∫∫div(f) dV = ∫∫∫3x+1 dzdydx
∫∫3xz+z | z = 0..3-3x-3y/2 dy dx
∫∫3x(3-3x-3y) + 3-3x-3y -[ 0] dydx
∫∫9x -9x^2 - 9xy +3 -3x - 3y dy dx
∫∫6x - 9x^2 -9xy +3 -3y dy dx
∫6xy - 9x^2y - 9xy^2/2 + 3y - 3y^2/2 | y = 0..-2x+2 dx
∫6x(-2x+2) - 9x^2(-2x+2) -9x(-2x+2)^2/2 +3(-2x+2) -3(-2x+2)^2/2 dx
∫-12x^2 + 12x +18x^3-18x^2-(9x/2) (4x^2 -8x + 4) -6x + 6 -3(4x^2 - 8x + 4) dx=
∫-12x^2 + 12x + 18x^3 -18x^2 -36x^3/2 + 72x^2/2 -36x/2 + 6 -12x^2 +24x - 12 dx=
-12x^3/3 + 12x^2/2 + 18x^4/4 -18x^3/3 -36x^4/8 + 72x^3/6 - 36x^2/4 +6x -12x^3/3 +12x^2 -12x from x =0..1
-12/3 + 12/2 + 18/4 -18/3 -36/8 +12 -9 +6 -4 + 12-12 =1


:\ I'm frustrated with this problem.
 
You don't have a closed surface. You're calculating the flux only on one plane. The volume integral of the divergence would equal the total flux through the plane and the other three sides of the tetrahedron.
 
Hmm.. But the problem states "...part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit normal n pointing in the positive z direction." That doesn't mean that the flux is the net flux of the closed surface, but the flux of only that portion of the plane?
 
thepatient said:
First, I parametricized the surface as a vector in terms of u and v:
x = u
y = v
z = 2 -3x - 1.5y
You solved for z incorrectly. It should be z = 3 - 3x - (3/2)y = 3 - 3u - (3/2)v.
\overline{r}(u,v) = <u, v, 2-3u - 1.5v>
R is the region on the u, v plane under the line v = 2 -2u, u≥0, v≥0
Took partial derivatives in terms of u and v:
d\overline{r}/du = <1, 0, -3>
d\overline{r}/dv = <0,1,-1.5>

Calculated |dr/du X dr/dv|:
i j k
1 0 -3
0 1 -1.5 =
|3i + 1.5j + k| = (9 + 2.25 + 1)^1/2 = 3.5

Calculated n:
Since the plane is 6x + 3y + 2z = 6, perpendicular to the plane would be the vector v = <6, 3, 2>, so n would be v/(|v|), the vector divided by its magnitude.
n = <6, 3, 2>/|7| = <6/7, 3/7, 2/7>
All this is fine.
Calculating f(u,v) * n:
f(u,v) = <(u^2), (uv), (2 -3u - 1.5v)>* <6/7, 3/7, 2/7> =
1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v)
You propagated the error from above, but your method is okay. With the correct expression for z, you would get
\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1\int_0^{2(1-u)} (6u^2+3uv+6-6u-3v)\,dv\,du = \frac{7}{4}
Plugging into equation:
\int\int_{R}f*n*d\sigma R=[(u,v): 0<u<1, 0<v<2-2u]

\int\int_{R} 1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v) *(3.5) *dvdu =

1/2 \int\int_{R}6u^2 + 3uv -6u - 3v + 4 dv du =
1/2 \int6u^2v + 3uv^2 -3v^2/2 + 4v (evaluating v from 0 to 2-2u) dv

Using wolfram alpha to evaluate (got tired of doing it by hand like 6 times XD) :
1/2 \int24u^3 + 30u^2 + 8u + 2 du from u = 0..1
1/2 * (24u^4/4 + 30u^3/3 + 8u^2/2 + 2u) from 0 to 1
1/2 (6 + 10+4+2) = 11

The answer should be 15/4 though. I'm not sure what I did wrong, maybe I missed something. Can anyone see what I did wrong in this problem? Thanks much.
 
thepatient said:
Hmm.. But the problem states "...part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit normal n pointing in the positive z direction." That doesn't mean that the flux is the net flux of the closed surface, but the flux of only that portion of the plane?
Yes, I think so, otherwise it wouldn't specify which direction the normal points in.EDIT: It turns out you get the same answer, 7/4, because the vector field vanishes on the other three faces, so there's no flux through them.
 
thepatient said:
If I remember correctly, since the surface Σ is closed, the divergence theorem applies right?

∫∫Rf*n*dσ = ∫∫∫div(f) dV

x is from 0 to one
y is from 0 to the line -2x + 2
z is from 0 to the plane 3 - 3x -3y/2

f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk
div(f) = d/dx i + d/dy j + d/dz k * x^2i + xyj + zk
= 2x + x + 1 = 3x+1

∫∫∫div(f) dV = ∫∫∫3x+1 dzdydx
∫∫3xz+z | z = 0..3-3x-3y/2 dy dx
∫∫3x(3-3x-3y) + 3-3x-3y -[ 0] dydx
You dropped the factor of 1/2 on the y term.

I would pull the (3x+1) out front since it's a constant for the y and z integrations: \int_0^1 (3x+1)\int_0^{2(1-x)} \int_0^{3-3x-3/2 y}dz\,dy\,dxIt'll simplify the algebra a bit. After you integrate over z, you'll have\int_0^1 (3x+1)\int_0^{2(1-x)} (3-3x-3/2 y)\,dy\,dx = \int_0^1 3(3x+1)\int_0^{2(1-x)} [(1-x)-y/2]\,dy\,dx
If you keep things in terms of 1-x, I think the result of the y integral will be pretty simple. To do the x integration, you'll just have to bite the bullet and multiply it out, or try the substitution u=1-x.
∫∫9x -9x^2 - 9xy +3 -3x - 3y dy dx
∫∫6x - 9x^2 -9xy +3 -3y dy dx
∫6xy - 9x^2y - 9xy^2/2 + 3y - 3y^2/2 | y = 0..-2x+2 dx
∫6x(-2x+2) - 9x^2(-2x+2) -9x(-2x+2)^2/2 +3(-2x+2) -3(-2x+2)^2/2 dx
∫-12x^2 + 12x +18x^3-18x^2-(9x/2) (4x^2 -8x + 4) -6x + 6 -3(4x^2 - 8x + 4) dx=
∫-12x^2 + 12x + 18x^3 -18x^2 -36x^3/2 + 72x^2/2 -36x/2 + 6 -12x^2 +24x - 12 dx=
-12x^3/3 + 12x^2/2 + 18x^4/4 -18x^3/3 -36x^4/8 + 72x^3/6 - 36x^2/4 +6x -12x^3/3 +12x^2 -12x from x =0..1
-12/3 + 12/2 + 18/4 -18/3 -36/8 +12 -9 +6 -4 + 12-12 =1:\ I'm frustrated with this problem.
Either way, you should get 7/4 for the answer, so I wouldn't bother beating your head against the wall to try get 15/4. That answer is apparently wrong.
 
  • #10
You're right. I should just try the problems on my other calculus book. This book was a free online book which I think didn't have much revisement. Thanks much for your help. :]
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K