Calculating Fractal Dimension for the Lorenz Strange Attractor

  • Thread starter Thread starter broegger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Fractal
broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi.

How can I "experimentally" (by way of computer simulation) calculate an approximate value for the dimension of a fractal object? The object in question is the Lorenz strange attractor, which has a dimension between 2 and 3.

Also, I know there is a number of different ways to define fractal dimension (Hausdorff dimension, Correlation dimension, Pointwise dimention etc.): are these equivalent or does it matter which one is used?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My notes have this old citation:

N. B. Abraham, A. M. Albano, B. Das, G. De Guzman, S. Yong, R. S.
et al , Calculating the dimension of attractors from small data sets, Phys. Lett. A 114 (1986) 217.

I no longer have the paper, but I believe it may help.
 
I'll try to locate that one. Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top