Calculating Frequency for AC Waveforms

  • Thread starter Thread starter daveiejbeer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the frequency of AC waveforms, first convert the time from milliseconds to seconds. The frequency can be determined using the formula f = number of cycles / time in seconds. For the given examples, the first waveform completing 4 cycles in 5 ms results in a frequency of 800 Hz, while the second waveform completing 5 cycles in 8 ms results in a frequency of 625 Hz. It's important to remember that frequency is typically expressed in Hertz (Hz). Proper unit conversion is crucial for accurate calculations.
daveiejbeer
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello my mind has gone blanc whilst in the middle of my AC Theory assignment.
The question is:
Calculate the frequencies for the following wave forms:
i. An alternating current that completes 4 cycles in 5ms
ii. An alternating current that completes 5 cycles in 8ms.

Am I right in thinking work out how many ms to complete 1 cycle then work out using f = 1/T

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Dave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hello Dave! Welcome to PF! :wink:
daveiejbeer said:
Am I right in thinking work out how many ms to complete 1 cycle then work out using f = 1/T

Yup! :biggrin:

Well … sort-of … if it's 1 cycle in T milliseconds, then it's 1000 cycles in T seconds, so it's … ? :smile:
 
frequency is usually in Hz so you need first to convert the time from ms to s .. the second thing is that what you are thinking is right,but there is an even easier direct way .. Why just don't you say that the frequency (f) = no. Of cycles / time .. :) then you will have the problem done..
 
Hi daveiejbeer, welcome to PF.
Frequency f = no. of cycles per second.
In the first case convert ms to s and find f.
 
Thanx for your help. I have already worked out the answers but I wasn't converting it into seconds, Doh!

Thanx once again.

Dave
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top