A Calculating GPS Uncertainty for a Bicycle Trip

Robin64
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
Let's say I have a GPS unit that reports an "accuracy" (this is what the GPS device reports as the uncertainty in the measurement of position) of 15ft. I travel some distance, with the GPS reporting a position every second. At the end of 1000 seconds I arrive at my destination. For the sake of the analysis I'm going to assume that the "accuracy" is constant and restricted to a plane (I'm not concerned about elevation changes and uncertainty associated with elevation measurement). I'm also going to assume that uncertainty is a function of radius, and angle, where angle is measured as the angle between my actual path and the segment between my current reported position and my last. I'm assuming that uncertainty in angle is uniformly distributed over 2π radians. My last assumption is that the correct way to calculate the total uncertainty for my trip is through quadrature; however I'm not quite sure what form each term in the quadrature takes.

Can someone give me some insight?

Note that I'm not concerned about the other sources of GPS error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Robin64, welcome to PF!

Robin64 said:
the total uncertainty for my trip
What do you mean by total uncertainty for the trip. The 15 m uncertainty is an uncertainty in position, but a trip isn't a position. Are you interested in the uncertainty of the final position or in the length of the path or what?
 
I should have been more clear, I'm speaking with respect to how a bicycle GPS computer calculates the total distance for a trip, wherein the total distance is the sum of the distances measured with a given sampling frequency (my computer records GPS data once per second.).
Dale said:
Hi Robin64, welcome to PF!

What do you mean by total uncertainty for the trip. The 15 m uncertainty is an uncertainty in position, but a trip isn't a position. Are you interested in the uncertainty of the final position or in the length of the path or what?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top