Calculating Gyroscope Torque for Stabilization Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullenc525
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyroscope Torque
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resistance a gyroscope develops to an applied torque on its primary axis with a fixed secondary axis, one must consider the relationship between applied torque, angular velocity about the perpendicular axis, and angular momentum about the spin axis. The user seeks a straightforward formula to avoid complex calculations involving cross products. This information is crucial for designing a gyroscope that can stabilize a two-wheeled vehicle against moderate impacts. The goal is to achieve self-stabilization similar to a vehicle demonstrated in a referenced video. Understanding these dynamics will aid in estimating the necessary angular momentum for effective stabilization.
mullenc525
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I think what i have is a simple question and yet it is not answered by most of the articles on gyroscopes.

I am wondering how I can calculate the amount of resistance a gyroscope develops to an applied torque on the primary axis when the secondary axis is fixed. Ie, torque is applied perpendicular to the spin axis, and this axis perpendicular to the spin axis is the only degree of freedom of the gyro.

I am guessing the applied torque, angular velocity about the perpendicular axis, and angular momentum about the spin axis are related through a simple formula - I don't want to work my way through all the cross products though!

I am using this to design a gyro to stabilize a 2 wheeled vehicle. I want the vehicle to be able to self stabilize against a moderate impact such as another vehicle of similar size colliding with it at low speed.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically I want to build something that has similar capabilities to the vehicle in the video on this page: http://thrustcycle.com/ See about second 44. I'm trying to estimate what sort of angular momentum that gyro has.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top