Calculating Gyroscope Torque for Stabilization Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter mullenc525
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyroscope Torque
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the resistance a gyroscope develops to an applied torque on its primary axis with a fixed secondary axis, one must consider the relationship between applied torque, angular velocity about the perpendicular axis, and angular momentum about the spin axis. The user seeks a straightforward formula to avoid complex calculations involving cross products. This information is crucial for designing a gyroscope that can stabilize a two-wheeled vehicle against moderate impacts. The goal is to achieve self-stabilization similar to a vehicle demonstrated in a referenced video. Understanding these dynamics will aid in estimating the necessary angular momentum for effective stabilization.
mullenc525
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I think what i have is a simple question and yet it is not answered by most of the articles on gyroscopes.

I am wondering how I can calculate the amount of resistance a gyroscope develops to an applied torque on the primary axis when the secondary axis is fixed. Ie, torque is applied perpendicular to the spin axis, and this axis perpendicular to the spin axis is the only degree of freedom of the gyro.

I am guessing the applied torque, angular velocity about the perpendicular axis, and angular momentum about the spin axis are related through a simple formula - I don't want to work my way through all the cross products though!

I am using this to design a gyro to stabilize a 2 wheeled vehicle. I want the vehicle to be able to self stabilize against a moderate impact such as another vehicle of similar size colliding with it at low speed.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically I want to build something that has similar capabilities to the vehicle in the video on this page: http://thrustcycle.com/ See about second 44. I'm trying to estimate what sort of angular momentum that gyro has.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top